On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 23:32 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm assuming at the moment that this is a case of somebody spoofing
Karthik's address. I doubt the spam is from Karthik - just something that
snuck through the spamassassin and various other email controls and
happens to be a
when a software grant is received, it's important that the actual
donated code is recorded in the repository: the actual code donated is
identified by it's MD5 sum. it seems best to me to adopt a single drop
point in jakarta for these grants. i propose
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 23:32 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm assuming at the moment that this is a case of somebody spoofing
Karthik's address. I doubt the spam is from Karthik - just something that
snuck through the spamassassin and various other email controls
Hi...
I'm extremely sorry for this... Someone was spamming :(
Karthik
On 3/19/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 23:32 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm assuming at the moment that this is a case of somebody spoofing
Karthik's
robert burrell donkin wrote:
looks like we're going to need to think about turning on address
checking sooner or later this year. probably need to think about
ways to allow committers to post from their apache addresses.
Two separate issues, unless the e-mail was sent with his @apache.org
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Two separate issues, unless the e-mail was sent with his @apache.org
address. If *his* domain uses SPF, I believe that we would already honor
it. Our mail handling is transitioning, and we can pursue that option.
--- Noel
SPF of big email providers like
No problem Karthik, happens to us all. :)
Hen
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Karthik Kumar wrote:
Hi...
I'm extremely sorry for this... Someone was spamming :(
Karthik
On 3/19/06, J??rg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 23:32 -0500, Henri
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
when a software grant is received, it's important that the actual
donated code is recorded in the repository: the actual code donated is
identified by it's MD5 sum. it seems best to me to adopt a single drop
point in jakarta for these grants.
On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 12:09 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
when a software grant is received, it's important that the actual
donated code is recorded in the repository: the actual code donated is
identified by it's MD5 sum. it seems best to