The JDK portion would fall under:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200607.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comments welcome. I think I may have missed the obvious part about
specifying the required JDK in the POM, actually :)
Cheers,
Brett
On 13/09/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
That policy is just for you ;)
Mvgr,
Martin
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
I do object to the "everyone must build with maven 2" policy. :-)
Best regards
Henning
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
You have scope and optional as dependency parameters.
The combination of the 2 can provide what you are thinking about. Although not sure the dependency
report will make a separate list out of them. (but this is better for discussing on the maven user
list I guess)
Mvgr,
Martin
Henning Schmie
Hi All,
Just wanted to let people know I will be off-line for the next three
weeks or so while on holiday in Vienna, Austria (and Nuremberg, Germany)
[1].
I hope to meet up with a few Apache people while there as there are damn
few in New Zealand! I've emailed a couple of people but if there's
a
I do object to the "everyone must build with maven 2" policy. :-)
Best regards
Henning
Stephen Colebourne schrieb:
Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ortwin_Gl=FCck?=
writes:
JDK version: what a mess. IMHO this is THE information
Hi,
you just touched a raw nerve with me... :-)
As long as maven (at least maven 1, don't know about maven 2 yet)
doesn't differentiate between
* Compile dependencies (mandatory and optional)
* Runtime dependencies (mandatory and optional)
then IMHO the "dependencies" page not really useful
