On 29/05/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
uhm, this is as ambiguous as before. Do you consider third-party license
a notice (the foo library is distributed under the foo license as shown
here) or a license in its own right and you would put in into LICENSE.
According to
Hi,
uhm, this is as ambiguous as before. Do you consider third-party license
a notice (the foo library is distributed under the foo license as shown
here) or a license in its own right and you would put in into LICENSE.
According to http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new, the LICENSE
file i
Full license text should go in LICENSE and attributions and notices in NOTICE..
Mvgr,
Martin
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> Well, I understand it differently and Thomas (probably looking at other
> projects) did this too:
>
> - LICENSE.txt contains the terms under which the software is licensed