Re: Web Services

Zilberstein Yuval wrote: Hi, Do you know maybe of a way to implement web services? Yes. http://ws.apache.org/ O. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Web Services

Thanks a lot, Do you know if it can be used on tomcat? TX YuvalZ -Original Message- From: Ortwin Glück [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 11:50 AM To: Jakarta General List Subject: Re: Web Services Zilberstein Yuval wrote: Hi, Do you know maybe of a way to

Re: Web Services

Zilberstein Yuval wrote: Thanks a lot, Do you know if it can be used on tomcat? Yuval, You are looking for Axis / Axis2. This is not the right mailing list to discuss this. It's off topic for almost everybody on this list. Please use that projects's mailing lists. Ortwin -- [web]

RE: Web Services

Hi Yuval, Yes, we at eWave are very familiar with Web Services implementation, and will be happy to help you or Pelephone with this and any other J2EE stuff. Please let me know if it may be interesting for you. BR, Nimrod Riftin eWave Group CTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-

Jakarta HTTP Client ECCN

Hi I would like to know the ECCN numbers (Export control classification numbers) of the Jakarta HTTP Client component. Thank you in advance for your help Alfonso ___ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo!

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

If you vote again your vote is binding too :) Mvgr, Martin Thomas Vandahl wrote: Hi Sebastian, sebb wrote: However: http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html says much the same, and seems to be policy. As you can see from the SVN tag JCS_1_3 and the artifacts at my site, your

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

On 04/06/07, Thomas Vandahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sebastian, Hi sebb wrote: However: http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html says much the same, and seems to be policy. As you can see from the SVN tag JCS_1_3 and the artifacts at my site, your concerns have been addressed and

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

sebb wrote: Sorry for the delay in responding. The NOTICE file is much clearer, and the Xerox license is identified, so I am withdrawing my -1. When the rules have been clarified, the next release can implement any changes if necessary. Sebastian Thanks, I will clarify the result now,

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

Martin van den Bemt wrote: If you vote again your vote is binding too :) Next time. Thanks again for voting me in. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]