Dear Jakarta PMC
The POI community has voted to release POI 2.0 final, including 5
committer yea's and no nay's.
The dev list thread with the vote (and details of the release) is
accessible here:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=621794
We request to the PMC to
+1
-
Avik
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 20:28, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> All Jakarta Community Members :
>
> Howard M. Lewis Ship, on behalf of the committers of the HiveMind
> project in the Jakarta Commons sandbox, has proposed HiveMind as a
> Jakarta sub-project. The proposal was sent to this l
It'll be part of the DB project, AFAIK. And will probably take a while
to land in CVS.
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 12:03, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> Hm... wanted to check this code out of CVS but can't find it :-/
>
> Maybe I'm jumping the gun a bit... I can be patient ;)
>
> http://infoworld.com/artic
+1
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 21:28, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Suggested new bylaws are at:
>
> http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
>
...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
Wow! The one weekend I decide not to check mail!! :)
Am replying to the original message for convenience, but have read the
thread till this point.
Basically, the amount of negativity towards POI project in the thread
seems seems quite painful.
At the end of the day, I believe we keep say
It feels like they are acting as a separate entity in Jakarta and
even the ASF itself
Let me put on record my severe objection to this statement.
Regards
-
Avik
Quoting Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jakarta Board Report
First of all I like to mention that I haven't be able to sp
Quoting Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Avik,
I'd have been happy seeing POI move to a TLP. However, some of the
comments in this thread seem to preclude that possibility either. I
think his leaves the community between a rock and a hard place ... I
dont want us to be subsumed as a co
Quoting Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
So.. I think we need to:
1) Get the fixed POI release out. Fixed source headers, vote on the
files etc.
2) Sort out the legal statement so that it's more official and
organized (copying Harmony seems good). While everything I'm hearing
when I as
it
doesn't need a mandate from the PMC to be successful project, does it?
I regard this mail as positive. Hope I am not wrong.
Regards.
-
Avik
Quoting Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Avik,
Avik Sengupta wrote:
Wow! The one weekend I decide not to check mail!! :)
I k
> eg the legal issue, which still
> remains partially unanswered.
>
Andy has already replied that this was done in the early days of POI's entry
into Apache under discussion with POI's then mentor and the board. It was
also done as a consequence of a specific issue that had arisen.
Short of no
+1
On Friday 04 May 2007 2:47:44 pm Nick Burch wrote:
> Hi All
>
> After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, we think POI
> is ready to graduate to its own TLP. Thanks to the magic of ApacheCon,
> lots of people have been on-hand to help finalise the proposal for this,
> which i
11 matches
Mail list logo