Hi James,
Apache Tomcat has been an Apache top level project for years. It is no longer
part of Apache Jakarta.
http://tomcat.apache.org/
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
The Tomcat user list is very active with many people who will help you answer
this question. Let them know
Hi -
Or point Bugzilla and Gump to gene...@j (even discontinue Gump if the
nags are bound to fall on deaf ears).
Please do not - this discussion is a lot of traffic for gene...@j.
Or, maybe this Apache POI person should finish his migration and
unsubscribe?
Best Regards,
Dave
---
Sorry. No. Not on this list.
(1) Go to http://tomcat.apache.com look for their email list and ask
your question on that list.
(2) Please learn to be much more polite, as you have been very rude
in your earlier "replies."
(3) Questions belong in a new email message and not in a reply.
Tha
I was thinking he was asking the same thing as you, but after
composing an email like yours, I realized Shawn was asking if after
going to TLP he would remain as a committer to POI. I am sure that
the answer is "yes all current POI committers remain POI committers."
After going to TLP it wi
Call me a non-binding +1.
Thanks to all for the POI! It is delicious!
Thanks to Nick for the leadership!
Regards,
Dave Fisher
On May 4, 2007, at 4:17 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
Hi All
After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, we
think POI
is ready to graduate to its own TLP
Henri,
I appreciate what you did to help the POI project stand up and meet
Apache requirements. It is an ongoing process - I think the
subproject is close to doing it correctly and having a successful
release!
Cheers!
Dave Fisher
On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3
I always prefer to optimize my loops by unrolling them and doing each
step differently.
Funny to talk about pattern matching in a regexp thread :-D
Burnt from my release time to have Yegor chew through some POI bugs ...
Regards,
Dave
On Mar 19, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
You have to be kidding me..
The only problem I see is that people are all caught up in policies /
processes but I've yet to hear what the actual root "problem" is. I'm
sure it's intended to somehow prevent something nasty that has
happened in the past but these policies don't have any logic that
I have a thought that may not be an immediate solution.
Isn't the correctness of a release from a build point of view a
testable condition? Shouldn't this be built in to the build system.
The apache servers would not allow an "invalid" package. They define
the pattern. Isn't this GUMP? Not
Try
Make sure that is inside of debug="0" appBase="webapps" ...
Also, at least this is so for tomcat 4.1.31//
Good luck/
Dave
On Mar 15, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Richard Dunne wrote:
After subscribing to apache mailing list, I tried mailing
users@tomcat.apache.org and got a delivery failure
Hi Julius -
I have a question. Does "not-yet-commons-ssl" allow me to "virtual
host" multiple domain ssl certificates on a single socket on a Tomcat
4.1.31 server?
That would be awesome if it does.
Unofficial "+1"
Regards,
Dave Fisher
On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Julius Davies wrote:
Hi Jakarta Board-
A suggestion after reading with interest the recent POI vs. Jakarta
smoke and flames threads.
I think that Jakarta needs a voting application that can include PMC
quorum requirements, direct email vote requests, committer approval,
etc.
Maybe it already exists?
Anyone
12 matches
Mail list logo