Kevin A. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree. JView was terrible.
Hey, thats a bit unfair.
From a _technical_ perspective JView rocked. It was massively faster than
java of the time. In fact, according to
http://www.volano.com/report/index.html
it's _still_ faster (and more scalable) than
Isn't Web Services basically just the EDI concept with a trendy new name?
Applications have been talking to each other across company boundaries since
the 80's after all.
Just ask the car makers who've done all their purchasing, etc via web
services for aeons ... :-)
Geoff
- Original
Berin Loritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoff Soutter wrote:
Isn't Web Services basically just the EDI concept with a trendy new
name?
[snip]
This is true to a large extent. There are two key differences though:
the
information is in a standard format (XML) which only requires a generic
Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No matter how many requests they get, it's too bad, but this is for sure
not
going to happen, as what's delivered in the platform strictly must adhere
to
what the JCP produces. Apache is a member of the JCP for the J2EE
platform,
but not for the
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quote from http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/:
In addition to new features, version 1.4 ... is fully compatible with
previous J2SE software releases.
Either this statement is incorrect, or the bug report is valid.
Guess it depends on what fully means.
