Re: [BSF][VOTE] Release BSF 3.1 (based on RC3)

Hi Sebb, sebb wrote: > [Resending because I left off the VOTE prefix, and the subject change > does not seem to be filtering down ...] > > [Third time lucky?] > > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release. > > The artifacts are available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.1-R

Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.1 (based on RC2)

sebb wrote: > On 04/06/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> >> > I've hopefully fixed all the problems reported with the previous RC1. >> > >> > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release. >> > >> > The artifacts

Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.1 (based on RC2)

sebb wrote: > I've hopefully fixed all the problems reported with the previous RC1. > > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release. > > The artifacts are available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.1-RC2/ > > The Maven artifacts are at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/

Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.1

Hi Sebb, sebb wrote: > On 18/05/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] >> BTW: Is BSF 3.1 now compatible with Jexl2? Jexl2 has now its own script >> engine support, but BSF engines will force Jexl 1.2 in which creates >> incompatibilities for Jexl2 in BSF 3.0. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.1

sebb wrote: > On 18/05/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> >> > On 18/05/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >> >> >> Yes, if I add this, the build runs through. However, you're aware that >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.1

sebb wrote: > On 18/05/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] >> Yes, if I add this, the build runs through. However, you're aware that >> the >> usage of repositories within the POMs is strongly discouraged and IIRC >> will no longer work in M3? > > No,

Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.1

Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > sebb wrote: [snip] >> I'd like to see if there are any further problems before proceeding >> with another RC. > > Fine with me, I have some more pets in my compiler zoo ... ;-

Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.1

Hi Sebb, sebb wrote: > On 18/05/2010, Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] >> 1 required artifact is missing. >> >> for artifact: >> org.apache.bsf.testing:bsf-testing-e4x-1.6R7-Axiom:jar:3.1 >> >> from the specified remote repositories: >> a

Re: [VOTE] Release BSF 3.1

sebb wrote: > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release. > > The artifacts are available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.1-RC1/ > > The Maven artifacts are at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebsf-001/ > > The SVN tag is at: > > http://svn.apac

Re: [VOTE] Merge dev lists

Henri Yandell wrote: > Non-binding +1. > > Whether or not the projects find they like being on one list or not, > it will be good. If it's not liked, then it's another reason to go > TLP. +1 (non-binding) - Jörg - To unsubscr

Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list

Henri Yandell wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of >>> Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate >

Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Update of "JakartaBoardReport-current" by MartinvandenBemt

Martin van den Bemt wrote: > If everyone is ok with it, I will send the current state of this page as > the board report ? Reconsider the "June 2009" ;-) - Jörg > > Mvgr, > Martin > - Original Message - > From: "Apache Wiki" > To: general@jakarta.apache.org > Sent: Monday, May 18, 200

Re: [VOTE] Release Candidate JMeter 2.3 RC3

sebb wrote: [snip] > Thanks for all the useful information. > > I have not yet investigated why the IBM JVMs have problems with the > XMLSchema and XPath tests, but given that none of the other JVMs show > the same errors I'm not too worried. > > The other errors are all problems in the test code

Re: [VOTE] Release Candidate JMeter 2.3 RC3

Hi Sebastian, sebb wrote: > Following on from the helpful feedback on RC1, I've now created JMeter > 2.3 RC3 in the directory: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/dist > > Site documentation is here: > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/site > > > It should now build and test

Re: [VOTE] Release Candidate JMeter 2.3 RC1

Hi Sebastian, sebb wrote: > On 06/07/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> >> > I've created JMeter 2.3 RC1 in the directory: >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/dist >> > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Candidate JMeter 2.3 RC1

sebb wrote: > I've created JMeter 2.3 RC1 in the directory: > > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/dist > > Site/Docs are here: > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/jmeter-2.3/site > > All feedback welcome. > > [ ]+1 - the release candidate looks OK, proceed with full release > [ ]-1 - ther

RE: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

Folks, I am on holidays and offline for two weeks, so if anything is decided inbetween, the statement below is my official position. Cheers, Jörg Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Henri, > > Henri Yandell wrote on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:00 AM: > > [snip] > >> If th

RE: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

Hi Henri, Henri Yandell wrote on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:00 AM: [snip] > If that, or something like it, sounds like a good consensus plan, then > I'm definitely more in favour of that than Commons going to TLP. There > are really only four steps: > > Step 0: Consensus. > Step 1: Move 3 project

RE: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

Hi Stephen, Stephen Colebourne wrote on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:43 PM: [snip] > In summary: > a) I believe the status quo is not viable > b) I believe that merging commons into Jakarta merges two > mismatched groups > c) I believe that commons is big enough and strong enough to be a TLP > > So,

RE: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

Martin van den Bemt wrote on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:16 AM: > That's quite problematic : Jakarta is responsible for > jakarta.apache.org, not commons, sharing that > responsibility will just complicate things a lot. > > It's pretty simple to solve this though (even though > repeating myself here)

RE: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

Hi Danny, Danny Angus wrote on Monday, May 21, 2007 10:47 AM: > On 5/21/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Any attempt in any kind of direction has been vetoed down > and for me it is pointless to bring the same arguments again > in a new thread. > >

RE: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

Torsten Curdt wrote on Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:42 AM: > so this thread died again without a conclusion or resulution. because there seems none. Any attempt in any kind of direction has been vetoed down and for me it is pointless to bring the same arguments again in a new thread. [snip] -

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Move POI to TLP

Nick Burch wrote on Friday, May 11, 2007 1:28 PM: > On Fri, 11 May 2007, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> there were more votes: >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.general/9842 > > Hmm, that's odd. Yours doesn't seem to be showing on > mail-archives.apache.org

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Move POI to TLP

Hi Nick, there were more votes: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.general/9842 at least you did not count mine... - Jörg Nick Burch wrote on Friday, May 11, 2007 1:00 PM: > Hi All > > The voting has now closed, and the votes are in. We had 23 +1 votes, > of which 15 were from pmc mem

RE: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

+1 Henri Yandell wrote on Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:20 PM: > Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. > > However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that > it move to TLP. > > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution > > Please add your name if

RE: [VOTE] Move POI to TLP

+1 Nick Burch wrote on Friday, May 04, 2007 11:18 AM: > Hi All > > After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, > we think POI > is ready to graduate to its own TLP. Thanks to the magic of ApacheCon, > lots of people have been on-hand to help finalise the > proposal for this, > w

Re: [VOTE] Move Turbine to TLP

+1 Scott Eade wrote: > The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that the > Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own top > level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls for a > vote to take place. > > The proposal is available at:

RE: [VOTE] Petar Tahchiev as Jakarta Committer

+1 Felipe Leme wrote on Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:17 PM: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to have Petar Tahchiev as a Jakarta Committer. > > Petar currently works as software engineer in Bulgaria, but was a MSc > student last year, when we proposed porting the Cactus build to Maven > 2 as a

RE: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

sebb wrote on Monday, March 19, 2007 3:09 PM: > On 19/03/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sebb wrote: >>> Surely voting on creating a tag (if this is necessary) >> >> Absolutely. Any release tag must be a community decision == vote is >> required. >> >> >>> is completely diffe

RE: [PROPOSAL] Create [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailinglist..

Rainer Klute wrote on Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:49 AM: > Daniel F. Savarese schrieb: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew C. Oliver" writes: >> >>> lists. (If you disagree look at the list archive for >>> each over the last 6 months and see if you REALLY disagree in more >>> than THEORY).

Re: [VOTE] Move Velocity to TLP

+1 Nathan Bubna wrote: > The Velocity project has for some time now been making plans for a > proposal to the board that the Velocity projects leave the Jakarta > umbrella and become their own top level project. Martin has asked us > to hold a vote on the proposal here before he passes it along

RE: [VOTE] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

+1 (non-binding) What about the domrant commons-test? I already tried to reactivate the project, but due to a current lack of time I stopped this for now. Nevertheless I have a proposal in my outbox for an official attempt to reactivate it. - Jörg Felipe Leme wrote on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6

Re: Invitation

robert burrell donkin wrote: > On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 23:32 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote: >> I'm assuming at the moment that this is a case of somebody spoofing >> Karthik's address. I doubt the spam is from Karthik - just something that >> snuck through the spamassassin and various other email contr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta Language Components

Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Stephen Colebourne wrote: >> Reposted (edited) from original commons proposal. >> Currently this proposal has general, though not unanimous, support. >> A vote thread may follow this thread if the mood remains positive. >> >> > ... >> >> Jakarta Language Components wil

Re: Jakarta Sandbox?

Yoav Shapira wrote: > Hola, > >> > Yoav (who still bristles at the name Jakarta X Components -- we need >> > to get creative!) >> >> Jakarta Core Components/Pills/Marbles/Gems/Diamonds >> Jakarta Web Components/Pills/Marbles/Gems/Diamonds > > Gems would be a particularly interesting choice in li

RE: Jakarta Sandbox?

Yoav Shapira wrote on Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:47 PM: > Hola, > > > On 3/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Over on Commons-Dev, Stephen has suggested that we split some of the >> components out to form a Jakarta Language Components group. Consensus >> is in favour of the ide