On 3/14/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...regarding the forums - na. What does that help?
Judging from myself, users don't like to have to subscribe to mailing
lists, especially when they don't need the list on a daily basis. E.g.
I would hate to get every question and answer
On 3/14/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean like Nabble? (http://www.nabble.com)
Though I recently migrated my project (Floyd) to OpenQA, I don't
exactly know my way around there yet. But I think they are using Jive
(http://www.jivesoftware.com/).
cheers,
Tom
---
On 3/14/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just considering proposing exactly this!
>
> The issues about groupings, subprojects, etc. are completely irrelevant
> it seems to me. A community is the set of people subscribed to emails
> about a particular project, no more and no le
On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DbUtils and DBCP to db.apache.org sounds like a win to me; DBCP would
> point back to Jakarta for a dependency on [pool], but that helps to foster
> intra-project involvement.
>
> Betwixt, Digester and JXPath strike me as a bit more to swallow
On 3/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As a side note, perhaps this is an opportunity to evaluate if there
> > are better homes for some of the components ? E.g.
> > betwixt/digester/jxpath could benefit from going to XML commons, dbcp
> > and dbutils from going to DB etc. ?
>
> +
On 3/7/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Dudziak wrote:
> > Could you elaborate a bit on what the physical / visual-to-users
> > differences to the current commons, well, Jakarta sub-project will be
> > ? Will this be a new Jakarta sub-pro
On 3/7/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of a new Jakarta entity named 'Jakarta
> Language Components'.
>
> This will be formed from the following codebases:
> [lang]
> [io]
> [collections] - expected to divide
> [primitives]
> [codec]
> [id] - on ex
