Re: [VOTE] Move Jakarta to the Attic; close down Jakarta PMC

2011-11-10 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 10.11.11 19:01, Henri Yandell wrote: > A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to > close down the PMC. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] -1, because +1 "I go, and it is done; the bell invites me. Hear it not, Duncan, for it is a knell That summons thee to heaven or to hell.

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Jakarta Regexp to Attic

2011-03-24 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 22.03.11 01:00, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on > the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. +1 Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...

Re: [VOTE] Merge dev lists

2009-10-20 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Rahul Akolkar wrote: > [Suggestion is to please reply to the gene...@jakarta list only] > > This is a vote to consolidate the development lists at Jakarta into > one development and one notifications list. For background including > timing, anticipated benefits and some discussion, see proposal [1

Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list

2009-10-18 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 15.10.09 00:49, Henri Yandell wrote: Slightly less tongue in cheek - maybe now is the time to move ORO, Regexp and ECS over to Commons. I thought, Attic was the correct place, at least for ECS? Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscrib

Re: Announcements without Release Notes

2009-01-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > For example, I just got an email about Mailet 2.4 release, but there was no > link to release notes or a JIRA link that might show what was done between > 2.3 and 2.4. I couldn't find any information on the site either. So, my > questions are: > Maybe I just don't kno

OT: Java question: FileChannel.transferTo()

2008-08-24 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi folks, sorry for the off-topic question but I was bitten by a generic Java issue and I thought there might be a couple of experts out there. I tried to use FileChannel.transferTo() to copy large files efficiently. Now the common way to use this is inChannel.transferTo(0, inChannel.size(), out

Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example, the > Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and for > Harmony, to DB and XML! Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive > projects, has no connection to anything else... > I agree

Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories

2007-06-07 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Danny Angus wrote: > Yes.. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site2.html I've never seen this before. What link would have taken me there? From jakarta.apache.org, I mean? Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories

2007-06-07 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Roland, Roland Weber wrote: > This one covers svn, but not the Ant part: > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html The ant part is covered by the readme in SVN. A hint in that file would have helped. Sorry for the fuzz. Bye, Thomas. --

Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories

2007-06-07 Thread Thomas Vandahl
sebb wrote: > Thanks; that's also fixed the missing updates. > > I wonder how it happened? That was me. I could have *sworn* that I copied these over by accident and as busy to remove them as fast as possible. Is this procedure "svn update - edit - ant - svn commit - svn update site" documented s

[ANNOUNCE] JCS 1.3 released

2007-06-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Jakarta JCS 1.3 is now available. JCS is a distributed caching system written in Java. This release is the first official release of JCS under the Jakarta Project. JCS 1.3 has been uploaded to the usual places and is/will soon be available in either binary or source form from the following sources

Corrected Result: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-06-05 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Voting has closed. Here are the results: > > +1 votes: > Hanson Char <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Aaron Smuts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Scott Eade

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-06-04 Thread Thomas Vandahl
sebb wrote: > Sorry for the delay in responding. > > The NOTICE file is much clearer, and the Xerox license is identified, > so I am withdrawing my -1. > > When the rules have been clarified, the next release can implement any > changes if necessary. > > Sebastian Thanks, I will clarify the res

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-06-04 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Martin van den Bemt wrote: > If you vote again your vote is binding too :) Next time. Thanks again for voting me in. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-06-04 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Sebastian, sebb wrote: > However: > > http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html > > says much the same, and seems to be policy. As you can see from the SVN tag JCS_1_3 and the artifacts at my site, your concerns have been addressed and the license files have been fixed. I would like to ask y

Re: Result: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-06-03 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Roland, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Thomas, > >> I could not find any information about whether Rony Flatscher is a >> member of the PMC > > In the committers-only SVN module is a file board/committee-info.txt > which lists the PMCs of all Apache projects. It's (supposed to be ;-) > the authorit

Result: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-06-03 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Now, shall we release JCS as it is published there? > > [ ] +1 Yes, JCS 1.3 should be released > [ ] 0 I do not care > [ ] -1 No (give reasons) Voting has closed. Here are the results: +1 votes: Hanson Char <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thomas Vand

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-31 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Actually, it's more than that. But so be it. I will update the files on > my site and kindly ask for a re-vote. Done. I chose the separate LICENSE file. The maven2-POM is also part of the distribution.

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-30 Thread Thomas Vandahl
sebb wrote: > The NOTICE file is not supposed to contain any licenses. I beg to differ, but I will not go into this again. > I suggest you remove the Xerox license header from it, and add it to > the LICENSE file, with the appropriate introduction. The LICENSE.txt file is supposed to contain the A

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-30 Thread Thomas Vandahl
sebb wrote: > I find the current NOTICE rather misleading - it looks as though the > whole of JCS is licensed under a Xerox licence. > > I think it's therefore important to fix this. >From re-reading the NOTICE file, I agree with you. My proposal to solve this is the following: ---8<--- Apache J

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-27 Thread Thomas Vandahl
sebb wrote: > I don't think so. The NOTICE is not supposed to contain the license. It doesn't. It contains what I understand as "license header" of that one Xerox file and the associated copyright notice. Bye, Thomas. - To unsu

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-26 Thread Thomas Vandahl
sebb wrote: > Sorry, but: -1 > > There should be NOTICE files in all the archives (jar, zip etc). > The NOTICE file (found in SVN) needs to refer to Xerox - see > jcs-1.3\src\aspect\Trace.aj > > No KEYS file to check the signatures - and could not find it in SVN. > > Sourcefiles: > There should

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-26 Thread Thomas Vandahl
sebb wrote: > But you _are_ still a committer... Yes, but then, everybody else in Jakarta is also potentially a committer for JCS and we would not want to list them all. By, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] F

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-26 Thread Thomas Vandahl
sebb wrote: > Sorry, but: -1 > > There should be NOTICE files in all the archives (jar, zip etc). > The NOTICE file (found in SVN) needs to refer to Xerox - see > jcs-1.3\src\aspect\Trace.aj > > No KEYS file to check the signatures - and could not find it in SVN. > > Sourcefiles: > There should

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-26 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Now, shall we release JCS as it is published there? > > [X] +1 Yes, JCS 1.3 should be released > [ ] 0 I do not care > [ ] -1 No (give reasons) Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [

[VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-26 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi folks, After much discussion on the JCS developer list, the first official release of JCS (version 1.3) after leaving the Turbine project is ready to vote on. You can find the created artifacts here: site: http://people.apache.org/~tv/jcs/ jars: http://people.apache.org/~tv/jcs/jar/ dist: http

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-09 Thread Thomas Vandahl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Henri Yandell wrote: > [ ] +1 I support the proposal > [ ] +0 I don't care > [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Bye, Thomas. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkZCAcQACgkQLrlGgoiBdALLHACfXHNOdEk

Re: [VOTE] Move POI to TLP

2007-05-04 Thread Thomas Vandahl
+1 Nick Burch wrote: > After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, we think POI > is ready to graduate to its own TLP. Thanks to the magic of ApacheCon, > lots of people have been on-hand to help finalise the proposal for this, > which is attached below. Bye, Thomas. --

Re: [VOTE] Move Turbine to TLP

2007-04-29 Thread Thomas Vandahl
[X] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [ ] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... Thanks, Scott, for bringing this to life. Bye, Thomas. Scott Eade wrote: > The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that the > Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and b

Re: [Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project fulcrum-cache (in module jakarta-turbine-fulcrum) failed]

2006-08-02 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Bill Barker wrote: You need to: $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata $ cd metadata/project $ vi jakarta-turbine-fulcrum.xml $ svn ci Thanks for the help. It does change something but doesn't fix the problem completely. I added both dependencies as it is done in other project

[Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project fulcrum-cache (in module jakarta-turbine-fulcrum) failed]

2006-08-01 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi folks, we get those messages by gump that puzzle me. These are not uncommon dependencies I guess. I made sure that the two files exist on ibiblio. How do I know about which dependencies gump knows and which it doesn't know? Bye, Thomas. Original Message [...] The build c

Re: JIRA Developer rights on Torque and Turbine

2006-07-13 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Henri Yandell wrote: Something's wrong with the chair :) I missed the email asking for commit rights. Nevermind. Sorry about that, I've added you to both SVN and JIRA now. Thanks a lot. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: JIRA Developer rights on Torque and Turbine

2006-07-13 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Henri Yandell wrote: You don't have commit rights to Turbine, so no on the Turbine JIRA bit. ??? Scott Eade sent message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to announce the vote result. Is something wrong with the vote? Bye, Thomas. --

JIRA Developer rights on Torque and Turbine

2006-07-13 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Could some kind soul please add user tv as a developer to the Torque and Turbine projects. Thanks in advance. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jakarta Commit access

2006-06-06 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi folks, how is the common svn commit access supposed to work? I was trying to commit something to Fulcrum but got "403 Forbidden". I have commit access to Torque, however. Any hint is welcome. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscrib