Re: [RESULT] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-05-12 Thread Henri Yandell
Okay - will send it up to the board for inclusion in the next board meeting. Hen On Thu, 11 May 2006, Felipe Leme wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: The answer, I believe, is that "yes testing.apache.org would welcome communities built around non-Java test tools. ". ie) No indecipherable code d

Re: [RESULT] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-05-11 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 5/11/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hola, > > The answer, I believe, is that "yes testing.apache.org would welcome > > communities built around non-Java test tools. ". ie) No indecipherable > > code dumps, but if a facet of the testing community wants to build > > around a langua

Re: [RESULT] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-05-11 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hola, > The answer, I believe, is that "yes testing.apache.org would welcome > communities built around non-Java test tools. ". ie) No indecipherable > code dumps, but if a facet of the testing community wants to build > around a language other than Java - the more the merrier. +1. I'm fine

Re: [RESULT] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-05-11 Thread Felipe Leme
Henri Yandell wrote: The answer, I believe, is that "yes testing.apache.org would welcome communities built around non-Java test tools. ". ie) No indecipherable code dumps, but if a facet of the testing community wants to build around a language other than Java - the more the merrier. Any di

Re: [RESULT] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-05-11 Thread Henri Yandell
One comment when I brought this up on [EMAIL PROTECTED] that I thought I should pass back is the (hopefully obvious) question about whether the project would accept non-Java test tools. This was a sticking point in the commons/jakarta-commons fracas. The answer, I believe, is that "yes testi

Re: [RESULT] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-04-24 Thread Felipe Leme
On 4/24/06, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, while I simply don't care on this particular issue. I object to > the bizarre form of this vote by procedure as a > matter of practice. On these issues: > > 1. If you don't get any response from the dev list of that project > coming t

Re: [RESULT] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-04-24 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
BTW, while I simply don't care on this particular issue. I object to the bizarre form of this vote by procedure as a matter of practice. On these issues: 1. If you don't get any response from the dev list of that project coming to the PMC with a vote seems to be "call votes until I get the an

[RESULT] Move Jakarta Cactus/JMeter to new Testing TLP

2006-04-23 Thread Felipe Leme
Hi all, After the second run, the move has finally been approved! Here are the final votes: *** Binding (PMC Members) votes in order they were received +1 Felipe Leme +1 Peter Lin +1 Yoav Shapira +0 Sebastian Bazley +0 Henri Yandell +1 Vincent Massol +1 Stephen Colebourne +1 Scott Eade +1 Rahul