Sam said that we should obtain "nominations for chair
from people in the (potentially expanded) PMC ranks by
the 16th," followed by "[a]n election where every
member of the PMC has one vote...to be completed on
the 18th."
Whoops, we're late.
Are we obligated to choose a chair this month. I
don't
Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Sam said that we should obtain "nominations for chair
from people in the (potentially expanded) PMC ranks by
the 16th," followed by "[a]n election where every
member of the PMC has one vote...to be completed on
the 18th."
Whoops, we're late.
Are we obligated to choose a ch
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> > Sam said that we should obtain "nominations for chair
> > from people in the (potentially expanded) PMC ranks by
> > the 16th," followed by "[a]n election where every
> > member of the PMC has one vote...to be completed on
> > t
Henri Yandell wrote:
My read is that if an election were held today, I would be running
unopposed. Instead of going through the motions and having a one party
election, I would much rather go "month to month"... in other words, if
any PMC member wants to call for an election at any time, it's OK
Sam Ruby wrote, On 18/03/2003 19.51:
...
Officially, I have been told that all that it entails is an email once a
quarter with the status to the board. This is a lie.
...
Hehehe... as an Avalon chair in these months, I know what that means too ;-)
...
the plus side is that you will have a wonde