Rahul Akolkar wrote:
If there is a connection to be drawn, I think many probably won't ;-)
Always the risk with names that don't spell out precisely what name.
You can easily be *too* clever, this could be one of those cases.
I'd refrain from voting until a formal thread appears on the subj
On 8/9/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All would be describable (assuming no clashes) as:
>
> Apache Jakarta Web Components
> Apache Web Components
>
> There's the option of doing W*4J or something, but we can discuss that
> later I think as it's just an altered presentation of th
For what it's worth, I actually like Silk a great deal... in fact, I'd
go ahead and give it my non-binding +1... I was the one that put the
idea on the Wiki of a more codeword-ish name, and I think Silk is perfect.
Frank
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How about Apache Spider Web?
No, but you just
> How about Apache Spider Web?
No, but you just gave me an idea:
Apache Silk
Silk is what webs are made of.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey,
How about Apache Spider Web? ;) Sorts of like it traps things, double-entendre
on the meaning of web, etc.. Just thought I'd throw it out there ;)
Yoav
--- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also Web parts appears to be a Microsoft term
>
> I have a shirt around here someo
> Also Web parts appears to be a Microsoft term
I have a shirt around here someone regarding "Parts for Java", which was a
product from ParcPlace.
Apache WebParts would be OK with me, but I care more about the content of
the project than the name.
--- Noel
-
Martin Cooper wrote:
Some other names were added to the wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/CreatingCommonsForWebComponents
I forgot to add some names to that page:
Webbies(has the same idea of weblets, but causing less confusion)
Jakartlets (someone suggested we use a name without
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 16:27 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
> NOTE-2
> ==
> Despite the suitability of this name, we are hesitant to duplicate the
> Commons brand and confuse the user.
even though Apache WC would definitely tickled many brits...
- robert
On 8/9/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Prior to calling a vote tomorrow, am I missing any potential names. This
> is all I dredged out of the previous mail thread. 'webapp' was mentioned
> instead of 'web'; but didn't seem to get any traction.
>
>
> web b
