Tracking subproject liveliness (was Re: Tracking commons component liveliness)

2005-07-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/27/05, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a big problem with putting people's names beside projects and components on a public web page. Besides being yet another thing that needs to be kept up to date, it will only encourage people to contact the developers directly,

Re: Tracking commons component liveliness

2005-07-27 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: There have recently been some discussions about handling dormant/dead commons projects. And I've been wondering about the activity levels of some projects recently (whether they are dead or not). It's hard to track activity by email volumes, and

Re: Tracking commons component liveliness

2005-07-27 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Henri Yandell wrote: Also, in Jakarta terms, you're talking about moving 50-100 people, which is Oops, wrong number. 50-100 is the PMC, 50-400 is Jakarta, which in itself shows the possibility for inactivity. Came up with an idea for using SVN karma to drive this,

Re: Tracking commons component liveliness

2005-07-27 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote: Hi All, There have recently been some discussions about handling dormant/dead commons projects. And I've been wondering about the activity levels of some projects recently (whether they are dead or not). It's hard to track activity by email

Re: Tracking commons component liveliness

2005-07-27 Thread Torsten Curdt
I have a big problem with putting people's names beside projects and components on a public web page. Besides being yet another thing that needs to be kept up to date, it will only encourage people to contact the developers directly, instead of using the mailing lists. From my own