Re: mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-07-05 Thread Felipe Leme
Martin Cooper wrote: +1 to just one dev and one user list, shared for all components, a la Jakarta Commons. Me too... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-07-03 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:33 -0400, Martin Cooper wrote: > On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > > > 4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the > > > j-c guidelines saying that each p

Re: mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-07-02 Thread Martin Cooper
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > 4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the > > j-c guidelines saying that each package has its own mailing list. If > > that is intentional, I th

Re: mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-06-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > 4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the > > j-c guidelines saying that each package has its own mailing list. If > > that is intentional, I th

mailing lists for components [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] subproject that's a home for bricks reusable in java web applications]

2005-06-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > 4.1 in the guidelines repeats the error that I thought was fixed in the > j-c guidelines saying that each package has its own mailing list. If > that is intentional, I think that is a *bad* idea, especially to start. it was intentional in