Re: [rds-devel] [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

Or Gerlitz wrote: On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Andy Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: We've been discussing dropping RDS's support for using TCP as a transport, and just focusing on RDS as a IB and iWARP-focused protocol. do we have any results that

Re: [rds-devel] ***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

Jon Mason wrote: On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 12:48:53AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Andy Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We've been discussing dropping RDS's support for using TCP as a transport, and just focusing on RDS as a IB and iWARP-focused protocol.

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 12:48:53AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Andy Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We've been discussing dropping RDS's support for using TCP as a transport, > > and just focusing on RDS as a IB and iWARP-focused protocol. > > > do we have

***SPAM*** Re: [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Andy Grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've been discussing dropping RDS's support for using TCP as a transport, > and just focusing on RDS as a IB and iWARP-focused protocol. do we have any results that compare Oracle IPC using rds/bcopy/tcp vs udp? This wou

Re: [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

> Has anyone talked about a SW implementation of iWarp? http://www.osc.edu/research/network_file/projects/iwarp/iwarp_main.shtml ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To uns

Re: [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:50:39PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > Jon Mason wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:04:19PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > >> We've been discussing dropping RDS's support for using TCP as a > >> transport, and just focusing on RDS as a IB and iWARP-focused protocol. > > > I

Re: [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:50:39PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > Lastly, we're looking to extend rds with more ib-centric features in the > future, so it would be a development burden to tunnel that over the TCP > transport...and that starts to sound a lot like reinventing iwarp ;-) Has anyone tal

Re: [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

Jon Mason wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:04:19PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: >> We've been discussing dropping RDS's support for using TCP as a >> transport, and just focusing on RDS as a IB and iWARP-focused protocol. > I found it useful for early development of RDS iWARP support. Hmm! Were

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx4: Set RAE and FRE flags, initialize mtt_sz field in the mpt entry.

thanks, applied. ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH] IB/ipath - fix SLID generation for RC/UC QPs

thanks, applied. ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband/core: Use a NULL test rather than an IS_ERR test

thanks, applied ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH] Bug 988: BMA responses are discarded in kernel

thanks, applied. (this patch was corrupted, because your mailer converted it to quoted-printable; in the future please use an MUA that can handle patches properly. I fixed this one up by hand) ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http:

Re: [ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:04:19PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > We've been discussing dropping RDS's support for using TCP as a > transport, and just focusing on RDS as a IB and iWARP-focused protocol. > > This would simplify the RDS codebase, allow easier inclusion of more > IB-centric features, a

Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.27] ib/cm: free cm_device structure

thanks, applied. ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

[ofa-general] Re: [IBSIM] add ReLink command

Hey Sasha, > So if one asked for ReLinking whole node? I think it should be > straightforward - restore links for all ports where previous_remote* > exists. What do you think? I didn't think of that before, but I think it's a good idea. So I tweaked it to handle this case when a port isn't speci

[ofa-general] [RFC] dropping RDS over TCP support

We've been discussing dropping RDS's support for using TCP as a transport, and just focusing on RDS as a IB and iWARP-focused protocol. This would simplify the RDS codebase, allow easier inclusion of more IB-centric features, and also give RDS an easier path towards mainline Linux kernel inclusion

[ofa-general] IBTA Technical Forum

Hello OFA Members - the technical forum is just two weeks away! Please register and book your travel now. We have added more speakers to our agenda, including Jacob Hall from Wachovia. The full agenda is posted at http://www.infinibandta.org/e

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx4: Set RAE and FRE flags, initialize mtt_sz field in the mpt entry.

On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 08:48 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > I need help deciding whether to get this in 2.6.27 or not. With this > patch, how is send queue fast register working? If this is the last fix > then I think we can get it in 2.6.27. If you are still debugging and it > still doesn't work

[ofa-general] [PATCH] opensm: move vendor specific compilation flags to config.h

From: Ira Weiny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Move vendor specific compilation flags VENDOR_RMPP_SUPPORT, DUAL_SIDED_RMPP, and OSM_VENDOR_INTF_* to config.h. Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- opensm/config/osmvsel.m4| 11

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm/Makefile.am: adding yacc-generated .h file as dependency

On 18:03 Mon 01 Sep , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: > Hi Sasha, > > Adding header file that is produced by yacc/bison to the > general dependencies. W/o it compiling of lex-generated > .c file sometimes fails. > > Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied. Thanks. Sasha __

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] opensm/Makefile.am: adding yacc-generated .h file as dependency

Hi Yevgeny, On 18:03 Mon 01 Sep , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: > > Adding header file that is produced by yacc/bison to the > general dependencies. W/o it compiling of lex-generated > .c file sometimes fails. Do you have a log of failure? Sasha > > Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <[EMAIL PRO

[ofa-general] ofa_1_4_kernel 20080902-0200 daily build status

This email was generated automatically, please do not reply git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_4/linux-2.6.git git_branch: ofed_kernel Common build parameters: Passed: Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.16 Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.18 Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.17 Passed on i686 with