http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13757
Summary: Lockdep complains about possible irq lock inversion
dependency
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.30.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
T
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13893
Summary: NULL pointer dereference by SRP initiator after
restarting SRP target followed by SCSI reset of
initiator
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.30.3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14042
Summary: mlx4: device driver tries to sync DMA memory it has
not allocated
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.30.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14235
Summary: SRP initiator lockup
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: P1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410
Summary: compilation of srptools fails on all platfroms (x86_64,
i686, ppc64, sles10 & rh4u3)
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-05 07:45 ---
OFED-1.2-20070304-0600 srptools compiled fine for me on RHEL4 U3 x86_64.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.openfabrics.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugma
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413
Summary: IPoIB passes async events to an unrelated devices.
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
P
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|REO
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugma
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugma
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417
Summary: can't unload drivers on SLES10 x86_64
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: SLES 10
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|can't unload drivers on |can't unload OFED 1.2
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420
Summary: PKey table reordering caused by SM failover stops ipoib
traffic
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |critical
--- Comment #1 from [E
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423
Summary: kernel panic during service openibd start on i686
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2
Platform: X86
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priori
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441
Summary: IPOIB build faild on RHEL5
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: PPC64
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P1
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447
Summary: ib_ipoib kernel 2.6.9-34 panic when routing to 10G
ethernet
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-12 13:46 ---
Subject: New: ib_ipoib kernel 2.6.9-34 panic when routing to 10G
ethernet
This is for OFED 1.1, isn't it?
Did you apply the patches listed at the support page (some of
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449
Summary: DMA vs CQ race on IA64 Altix platform
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: IA64
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
Summary: IPoIB BW drop (measured with iperf) with mtu=1500 on x86
RH4UP3
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: X86
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 05:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=96)
--> (https://bugs.openfabrics.org/attachment.cgi?id=96&action=view)
Full description of the test environment
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 05:36 ---
Subject: New: IPoIB BW drop (measured with iperf) with mtu=1500 on x86 RH4UP3
Looks like you have some protocol errors.
Why are you playing with ifc mtu?
What does tcpdump sho
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454
Summary: modprobe of ib_mthca on IA64 with RHAS4U2 fail with
unknown symbol ia64_max_cacheline_size
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: gen2
Platform: IA64
OS/Version: RHEL 4
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugma
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 09:08 ---
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] New: IPoIB BW drop (measured with iperf) with
mtu=1500 on x86 RH4UP3
On 3/13/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like you have
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 09:18 ---
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] New: IPoIB BW drop (measured with iperf)
with mtu=1500 on x86 RH4UP3
> >Why are you playing with ifc mtu?
>
> We needed to do some IP forwa
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 12:00 ---
last night I discovered an inconsistency in the IB stack
running on the back-end of our machines where the majority of the kernel
modules getting loaded were the stock RHEL4u3 a
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-14 02:30 ---
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] New: IPoIB BW drop (measured with iperf) with
mtu=1500 on x86 RH4UP3
On 3/13/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Why are you play
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-14 02:54 ---
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] New: IPoIB BW drop (measured with iperf)
with mtu=1500 on x86 RH4UP3
> Quoting Moni Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [ofa-general] [
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458
Summary: Heavy interrupt rates kill UDP performance
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.1
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: RHEL 4
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority:
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460
Summary: IP address assignment problem with IPoIB interfaces
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2alpha1
Platform: X86-64
OS/Version: SLES 10
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-14 22:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=97)
--> (https://bugs.openfabrics.org/attachment.cgi?id=97&action=view)
openib.conf on my machine
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.openfabrics.or
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.2alpha1 |1.2beta1
--- Comment #2 from [E
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 16:56 ---
In spite of version-skew cleanup we are still experiencing kernel panics on our
I/O nodes. I'll inline one of the latest stack traces for reference:
Kernel BUG at dev:1121
inv
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469
Summary: there may be a memory leak incase of ibv_fork_init
failure
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severi
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485
Summary: creating & deleting a subinterface with a bad pkey
crashs the kernel: NULL pointer reference
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2beta1
Platform: X86
OS/Version: RHEL
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488
Summary: user_mad GRH handling on receive side is incomplete
Product: OpenFabrics Linux
Version: 1.2beta1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
P
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-25 02:44 ---
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] New: IPoIB BW drop (measured with iperf) with
mtu=1500 on x86 RH4UP3
On 3/14/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quoting Moni Levy
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugma
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-26 07:43 ---
I don't think we wish to take this for OFED 1.2 now
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.openfabrics.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-26 07:49 ---
I think it's a pretty low risk fix. MST agreed to this aspect of it.
It would be nice to have this in. Is there a good reason not to ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.ope
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
61 matches
Mail list logo