Hey Toni, Hey Harald,
Taking a look at the various artifacts in paxexam I'm curious if it is
really required to have an exam-util. From a user point of view it's an
additional artifact he have to add and from a dev point of view an
additional point to search things :-). Looking at the code in the
Hi David,
Am 01.09.2011 12:51, schrieb David Bosschaert:
http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXRUNNER-403
Ok, this is something we can work with - Pax projects should be able, in
principle, to support all OSGi frameworks, and implementing another
adapter for another framework is a rather well-de
Hi there
I am using Pax Web in Version 1.1.1 with Jetty 7.5.0.RC0.
I registered servlets from several bundles with different HttpContexts and one
of them is registered for the root path ("/"). The code looks similar to this:
bundle 1:
httpService.registerServlet("/", servlet1, null, context1);
You should be able to do it yourself now :-) Feel free to ping me if I've
messed anything with the permissions :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 08:34, Harald Wellmann wrote:
> Am 01.09.2011 07:30, schrieb Toni Menzel:
>
>> I think this completes deployment on ops4j, doesn't it ?
+1 go for it.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> +1 for releasing them from the same staging repo. Otherwise good luck for
> PR 1.7.5 :-)
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 08:55, Harald Wellmann wrote:
>
>> Am 01.09.2011 09:06, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
1.11 -> 1.12
Well, I couldn't find a changelog, but maybe worth a try. @Sahoo can you
give it a shot? If it fixes the problem I can release today/tomorrow 1.3.6.
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 09:24, Toni Menzel wrote:
> Maybe we need to upgrade the aether dependency Version?
> O
Maybe we need to upgrade the aether dependency Version?
On Sep 2, 2011 8:10 AM, "Andreas Pieber" wrote:
> Hey Sahoo,
>
> I've just taken a look at the pax-url code... The indicated line is:
>
> LocalRepository localRepo = new LocalRepository( local );
> *
> *
> I'm afraid we cant do anything here
+1 for releasing them from the same staging repo. Otherwise good luck for PR
1.7.5 :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 08:55, Harald Wellmann wrote:
> Am 01.09.2011 09:06, schrieb Andreas Pieber:
>
>
>>(h) Does this version already include all the changes you
>>