Yep, that's exactly what I do. Every field with a pax-wicket annotation is
replaced at serialisation time with the information required to retrieve
the service again; once you deserialize the class again the injection is
redone; it's very similar to what wicket itself does for @SpringBeans; only
a
Thank you Andreas.
I thought omitting transient means they will be serialized (and cause
serialization problems), so @PaxWicketBean replaces the serialization
mechanism with injection?
Thank you again :)
Hendy
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Hey,
>
> The problem is tr
Hey,
The problem is transient. @PaxWicketBeans are never serialized, but always
retrieved a new. Please try to remove transient; this should do the trick.
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Hendy Irawan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My code is :
>
> @PaxWicketBean(name="bannersSupp
Start to work on a ComplexApplication containing a table, theme, .
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Yep, feel free.
> Any new Sample to show the power of the little framework we got is just
> great :)
>
>
> 2012/11/13 Charles Moulliard
>
>> Before to speak about a so
Hi Charles,
one more, I did take a quick look at the other two links, the first one is
base on the second so no much more info there
and the third is about a incubator project at eclipse.
Just for the record ;) my inital work can be found at [1] and [2], I
actually started in a way as Kai Toedter
Hi all,
My code is :
@PaxWicketBean(name="bannersSupplier")
private transient Supplier bannersSupplier;
On first request it's OK, but on "second" request (i.e. going to another
page and going back so now it has ?0 on the URI), it seems that the field
is now null.
bannersSupplier come from the B
Hi Charles,
I know the second link, it actually got me into thinking about a much
easier way of registering a Vaadin application. That's how I got into the
Extender-Pattern Implementation.
The first and second I have to take a closer look at, thanks for sharing.
regards, Achim
2012/11/13 Charle
Yep, feel free.
Any new Sample to show the power of the little framework we got is just
great :)
2012/11/13 Charles Moulliard
> Before to speak about a solution, maybe it could be more interesting to
> extend one of the example that we have to validate that we can support all
> the vaadin featu
Hi,
After a discussion that I had this morning with Joonas LEHTINEN, it comes
to me with some OSGI initiatives around Vaadin project :
- http://redvoodo.wordpress.com/howto/how-to-use-vaadin-osgi/
- http://www.toedter.com/blog/?p=850
- http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/technology.skalli/
I have n
Before to speak about a solution, maybe it could be more interesting to
extend one of the example that we have to validate that we can support all
the vaadin features on OSGI and next we could propose something using or
not blueprint. I will work to extend the SimpleApplication to use theme,
add-on
10 matches
Mail list logo
