Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-05 Thread Toni Menzel
Ah, nevermind, found it ;) On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Toni Menzel wrote: > Hi Glyn, > > great to hear about that! I am also very interested into adding Virgo to > that Exam supported stack. Since Virgo is an OSGi container i am quite sure > it can be supported in the 2.x line. I just have t

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-05 Thread Toni Menzel
Hi Glyn, great to hear about that! I am also very interested into adding Virgo to that Exam supported stack. Since Virgo is an OSGi container i am quite sure it can be supported in the 2.x line. I just have to admit i haven't looked at Virgo closely enough yet. - which needs to change ;) Now, my

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-05 Thread Glyn Normington
On 5 Jan 2012, at 04:19, Andreas Pieber wrote: > Hey Glyn, > > Since Virgo has a quite similar concept to Apache Karaf it might be possible > to do something similar for Virgo as I've done for Karaf. TBH I'm not sure > how different Virgo is from Karaf but maybe some sources can even be reused:

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-04 Thread Andreas Pieber
approach works for Java EE: the container is an (embedded) Java > EE server, the probe is a WAR built on the fly, and the injection method is > CDI. > > There is a growing number of Java EE servers which are built on OSGi > and/or offer an OSGi subsystem for deploying bundles in addition to >

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-04 Thread Glyn Normington
? > > > > > > The same approach works for Java EE: the container is an (embedded) Java > > > EE server, the probe is a WAR built on the fly, and the injection method > > > is CDI. > > > > > > There is a growing number of Java EE servers wh

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-04 Thread Toni Menzel
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Harald Wellmann wrote: > Am 04.01.2012 19:09, schrieb Toni Menzel: > > >> FYI, i just got to track the branch on the OPS4J CI: >> http://ci.ops4j.org/hudson/**job/org.ops4j.pax.exam3/ >> Now don't mess it up. Alm

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-04 Thread Harald Wellmann
Am 04.01.2012 19:09, schrieb Toni Menzel: FYI, i just got to track the branch on the OPS4J CI: http://ci.ops4j.org/hudson/job/org.ops4j.pax.exam3/ Now don't mess it up. Almost there ;)) Yeah, almost ;-) At the moment, there's still a few hard-coded paths and ports in the source code, so the

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-04 Thread Harald Wellmann
Hi Sahoo, thanks for your feedback! Yes, I'd looked at your Fighterfish test projects before I started implementing the new Pax Exam GlassFish Container, which made it a lot easier to get started, and of course I'm also trying to avoid duplicate work. No doubt I'll be back in while with ques

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-04 Thread Toni Menzel
r is an (embedded) Java >> EE server, the probe is a WAR built on the fly, and the injection method is >> CDI. >> >> There is a growing number of Java EE servers which are built on OSGi >> and/or offer an OSGi subsystem for deploying bundles in addition to >> tra

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2012-01-04 Thread Sanjeeb Sahoo
ing bundles in addition to > traditional WARs. > > Thus, an in-container testing framework should support both modes, OSGi > and Java EE, to let you test hybrid applications. > > As it happens, I created the jeeunit project [1] in 2010 for testing my > Java EE 6 projects - lon

Re: [Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2011-12-26 Thread Toni Menzel
servers which are built on OSGi > and/or offer an OSGi subsystem for deploying bundles in addition to > traditional WARs. > > Thus, an in-container testing framework should support both modes, OSGi > and Java EE, to let you test hybrid applications. > > As it happens, I create

[Proposal] Pax Exam 3.0: In-Container Testing Generalized

2011-12-26 Thread Harald Wellmann
addition to traditional WARs. Thus, an in-container testing framework should support both modes, OSGi and Java EE, to let you test hybrid applications. As it happens, I created the jeeunit project [1] in 2010 for testing my Java EE 6 projects - long before I started working with Pax Exam. The

Re: In-container Testing

2007-06-29 Thread Toni Menzel
th a nice(r) framework for doing in-container integration testing for non-platform bundles as well? Cheers, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Niclas Hedhman Sent: 28 June 2007 18:18 To: General OPS4J Subject: In-container Testing Gan

Re: In-container Testing

2007-06-29 Thread Rick Litton
, June 28, 2007 5:58 AM Subject: Re: In-container Testing > On 6/28/07, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Same here to the extend that you let me :) > > That sounds like me volunteering to do the dishes - - knowing that I > am not allowed... ;o) > > Well, t

RE: In-container Testing

2007-06-28 Thread David Leangen
ROTECTED] Behalf Of Niclas Hedhman > Sent: 28 June 2007 18:18 > To: General OPS4J > Subject: In-container Testing > > > Gang, > > I spoke last night with Richard Hall, and he 'volunteered' me and/or > the OPS4J community to rise to the occasion of creating an &g

Re: In-container Testing

2007-06-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On 6/28/07, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same here to the extend that you let me :) That sounds like me volunteering to do the dishes - - knowing that I am not allowed... ;o) Well, the first step is to gather some more ideas on how this should be done. I have not assembled a mental

Re: In-container Testing

2007-06-28 Thread Peter Neubauer
to roll up my sleeves and contribute whatever I > > can... ;) > > > > -- rick > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Niclas Hedhman" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "General OPS4J" > > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 20

Re: In-container Testing

2007-06-28 Thread Alin Dreghiciu
; To: "General OPS4J" Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 2:18 AM Subject: In-container Testing > Gang, > > I spoke last night with Richard Hall, and he 'volunteered' me and/or > the OPS4J community to rise to the occasion of creating an > in-container testing harness.

Re: In-container Testing

2007-06-28 Thread Rick Litton
Niclas, Count me in. I'm ready to roll up my sleeves and contribute whatever I can... ;) -- rick - Original Message - From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "General OPS4J" Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 2:18 AM Subject: In-container Testing

In-container Testing

2007-06-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Gang, I spoke last night with Richard Hall, and he 'volunteered' me and/or the OPS4J community to rise to the occasion of creating an in-container testing harness. He said, although he would rather see the solution in Apache Felix, he noted that it would then be a Felix only soluti