both fast. both correct. draw.
thank, guys!
On 26.09.2008, at 20:36, Alin Dreghiciu wrote:
> mvn dependency:tree
>
> There is also a switch to show more details. Check out dependency
> plugin.
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Toni Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Is there someone w
mvn dependency:tree
There is also a switch to show more details. Check out dependency plugin.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Toni Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there someone who can tell me a quick way to see the real maven
> dependency graph of a given artifact (all transitive deps in
2008/9/27 Toni Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is there someone who can tell me a quick way to see the real maven
> dependency graph of a given artifact (all transitive deps incl.
> version).
>
mvn dependency:tree
> I know there is a (simple) solution but currently cannot find it..
> thanks,
> Ton
27;t really write one.
Glyn> -Original Message-> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Niclas Hedhman> Sent: 8 September 2006 20:34> To: General OPS4J
> Subject: Re: Transitive dependency>>> On Friday 08 September 2006 18:39, Glyn Norm
. Seems that, as you pointed out, at this
point intuitive reasoning seems easier than formal reasoning...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Niclas Hedhman
> Sent: 8 September 2006 20:34
> To: General OPS4J
> Subje
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:39, Glyn Normington wrote:
> I'll refrain from expanding the formal mathematical definition as the
> intuitive notion is more important in computing.
>
> A familiar example could be an 'impactedBy' relation defined as the
> reflexive, transitive closure of the 'depend
I'll refrain from expanding the formal mathematical definition as the intuitive notion is more important in computing.A familiar example could be an 'impactedBy' relation defined as the reflexive, transitive closure of the 'dependsOn' relation since a bundle, for example, is obviously impacted by c
On Friday 08 September 2006 16:07, Glyn Normington wrote:
Cool!!
I am surprised I could follow that entire reasoning without much problem...
> Lastly, a relation R is reflexive if for each element x it deals with (I'll
> spare you the mathematical terms), x R x. You can take any binary relation
>
DavidNiclas answered correctly, but I'll give more background to the notion of transitivity in case you are interested. I'll also describe "transitive closures" and "reflexive transitive closures" as you're bound to run into those terms before long.
'transitive' is a mathematical propery of binary
Ivy solves the problem with transitive compiletime dependencies with
private configuration
(configuration in ivy is like scope in Maven)
Compiletime dependencies goes into a private configuration so it will
not be visible to other modules.
/Andreas
On 9/8/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Friday 08 September 2006 06:15, David Leangen wrote:
> Can I ask yet another basic question?
>
> What is a "transitive" dependency? When it's not transitive, what is it,
> intransitive?
>
> Is this "transitive" in the same sense as a transitive verb? Like:
>
> I am programming (v)
> I progra
11 matches
Mail list logo
