Or even easier:
svn propedit svn:ignore
Cheers,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Niclas Hedhman
> Sent: 19 June 2007 21:48
> To: General OPS4J
> Subject: Re: Use of svn:ignore in repo
>
>
> O
On 6/19/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> stick this list in a file (zzz) and use 'svn propset svn:ignore -Fzzz'
Just do a
svn propget svn:ignore
first to check for any pre-existing settings...
Cheers
Niclas
___
general mailing l
Great Stuart,
maybe an entry in the wiki on how to use it would be great, so one can
find docs on it. I can do it as soon as I get some time.
/peter
On 6/19/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI... added suggested svn:ignore list to community resources
>
> -- Forwarded mes
FYI... added suggested svn:ignore list to community resources
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 19-Jun-2007 17:30
Subject: svn commit: r6964 - projects/community/resources/subversion
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: mcculls
Date: Tue Jun 19 11
> On 6/19/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > imho the policy should be to ignore generated files, just as svn:eol-style
> > should be set to 'native' for text files (recommended subversion config).
> +1
Sounds good to me!
Cheers,
Dave
___
On 6/19/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> imho the policy should be to ignore generated files, just as svn:eol-style
> should be set to 'native' for text files (recommended subversion config).
+1
/peter
___
general mailing list
general@l
On 19/06/07, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wondering...
Is there a reason why you guys aren't using svn:ignore for all generated
files?
It makes the repository a little "messy" and hard to work with when
running "svn status" when the output is cluttered by stuff that
shouldn't
Just wondering...
Is there a reason why you guys aren't using svn:ignore for all generated
files?
It makes the repository a little "messy" and hard to work with when
running "svn status" when the output is cluttered by stuff that
shouldn't be there...
I don't mind adding it myself myself, just