Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-17 Thread Benson Margulies
Everyone seems to like this. I see no reason for a formal vote. If people would be so kind to update or create confluence content, when we have a critical mass I can organize the switcheroo. On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh cohei...@apache.org wrote: Another +1 from me. What

Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-16 Thread Andreas Veithen
Nadir, There is also a user who would like to submit updates for the Axis1/Java site (which as you pointed out is intertwined with Axis/C++) and who is struggling with the Forrest stuff [1]. Maybe you can join that discussion to see what can be done for the old Axis1 site. Andreas [1]

Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-16 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Another +1 from me. What about the webpages of the constituent projects? For example, WSS4J has its own Forrest generated webpage. Maybe this should be merged with the new WS confluence page as well? Colm. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Andreas Veithen andreas.veit...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for

Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-15 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
+1 for Confluence . Ideally pages like this [1] should be updated with noticeable events of sub projects and I also believe it's much more easy to maintains Confluence than Forrest. [1] - http://ws.apache.org/news.html Thanks ! On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-15 Thread Andreas Veithen
+1 for Confluence. I know more or less how the Confluence auto-export stuff works, but there are two technical questions that are not clear to me: 1. Where and how are the export templates maintained? 2. How is the exported content (https://cwiki.apache.org/WS) going to be published to

Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 15 October 2010 3:25:37 pm Andreas Veithen wrote: +1 for Confluence. I know more or less how the Confluence auto-export stuff works, but there are two technical questions that are not clear to me: 1. Where and how are the export templates maintained? This is the big negative.

Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-15 Thread Benson Margulies
I'm confused. Didn't Axis C++ travel with the rest of Axis? Obviously I wasn't paying enough attention. Anyway, people can start improving the Confluence content starting Right Now, and when we like it I can perform the switcharoo. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Nadir Amra a...@us.ibm.com

Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-15 Thread Benson Margulies
Nadir, Axis is its own TLP. It left its web content behind at people.apache.org:/www/ws.apache.org/ axis axis2 axis-c They should be making themselves a new web site under axis.apache.org, instead of what there is so far, a single HTML page under axis.apache.org pointing back into

Re: [PROPOSAL]: throw away the 'forrest' web site in favor of exporting the confluence site

2010-10-15 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
Hi Nadir, There are some discussions on java-dev list about axis site redesign [1] that also based on Confluence. Chanaka Jayasena already making some progress on this and you may join with him or you can take your own path. The best place to have your discussion is either axis java-dev list or