gt;>>>>>>>>>> assume a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> similar branch will exist for 1.3.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------
--
------------------
--
Subject:
Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
From:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:32:14 +0530
To:
general@xml.apache.org
CC:
xerces-
;>>>>>>>>>> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> (reason: 552 ZIP attachments are not accepted here.)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Wha
gt;>>>>>>>>>>> What should i do now ? Is there a way to upload sources on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>> server somewhere ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone guide me what is the procedure for such code
> >>>>>>>>>>>> grants ?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
half of the ASF, and don't let the
process
hold things up.
Great... Thanks Geir. No more held up is good
- Neeraj
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------
---
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------
--
Subject:
Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
From:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:32:14 +0530
To:
general@xml.apache.org
CC:
xerces-j-d
cc
04/06/2005 05:29 xalan-dev@xml.apache.org,
PMgeneral@xml.apache.org
Subject
Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3
Sources to
general@xml.apache.org
Subject
Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
xalan-dev@xml.apache.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Subject
Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 S
ore held up is good
- Neeraj
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------
--
Subject:
Donation of JAXP
rocess
hold things up.
Great... Thanks Geir. No more held up is good
- Neeraj
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------
--
Subject:
Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
From:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:32:14 +0530
To:
ge
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------
--
Subject:
Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
From:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:32:14 +0530
To:
general@xml.apache.org
CC:
xerces-j-dev , xerces-j-user
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
oad &
> >>>>> Save, SAX
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> 2, XML 1.1 and XInclude)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *JAXP 1.3 APIs source code is attached with this mail. *
> >
s up.
Great... Thanks Geir. No more held up is good
- Neeraj
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------
--------------------
Subject:
Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
From:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:32:14 +0530
To:
general@xml.apache.org
CC:
xerces-j-dev , xerces-j-user
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, xalan-dev@xml.apache.org,
[EMAIL PROTEC
[EMAIL PROTECTED], xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org, Eduardo
Pelegri-Llopart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
general@incubator.apache.org, general@xml.apache.org, Janet Breuer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Suttor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
; >>- Neeraj
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> >&
. Thanks Geir. No more held up is good
- Neeraj
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------
Subject:
Dona
some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and
> >>> xerces-j-dev as to how to actually check this in?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> There is no need to wait until Hall Hallowed-ness has been achieved.
> >> I have received them on behalf of the ASF, and don't let the process
&
l commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------
Subject:
Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
From:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:32:14 +0530
To:
general@xml.apache.org
CC:
xerces-j-dev , xerces-j-user
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, xalan-dev@xml.apache.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball
on this one.
Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that
Neeraj will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and
xerces-j
It is mostly an addition for the new functionality
(New Schema Validation Framework, javax.xml.validation,
New Schema Datatypes, javax.xml.datatype,
New Object model neutral XPath APIs, javax.xml.xpath)
introduced in JAXP 1.3
There have also been some changes in Xerces/xalan codebase to make those
On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball on
this one.
Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that Neeraj
will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and xerces-j-dev
as to how to actually
d to
xerces-j-dev
To
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
general@incubator.apache.org, Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Suttor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
general@xml.apache.org, xalan-dev@xml.apache.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], xerces-j-
Hi Shane,
Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/31/2005 03:38:37 PM:
> Hmmm... I'm presuming we'll get JAXP 1.3 checked in and then have
> Xerces/Xalan evaluate to form a plan on when/how they want to upgrade to
> supporting these new interfaces. They're currently supporting the
> c
Hmmm... I'm presuming we'll get JAXP 1.3 checked in and then have
Xerces/Xalan evaluate to form a plan on when/how they want to upgrade to
supporting these new interfaces. They're currently supporting the
checked-in JAXP 1.2 version code, with some spot improvements, now.
Basically, it's a ne
Pardon my ignorance, but are these sources to replace
code already present in Xalan and Xerces, or just to
add to them?
Thanks,
Glen
--- Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for
> picking up the ball on
> this one.
>
> Note: once the papers are
Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball on
this one.
Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that Neeraj
will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and xerces-j-dev as
to how to actually check this in? I'm presuming you have someone with
Thanks. It is good to see this issue moving forward.
- eduard/o
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
xml-common, xerces & xalan communities,
I have learnt that legal issues regarding donation has been resolved
and latest version of CCLA has been sign
On Mar 31, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
xml-common, xerces & xalan communities,
I have learnt that legal issues regarding donation has been resolved
and latest version of CCLA has been signed.
So would like to make the actual code grant of JAXP 1.3 APIs +
implementation ASAP. I will sta
xml-common, xerces & xalan communities,
I have learnt that legal issues regarding donation has been resolved and
latest version of CCLA has been signed.
So would like to make the actual code grant of JAXP 1.3 APIs +
implementation ASAP. I will start the preparation
today and will be back with act
El mar, 19-10-2004 a las 11:40 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz escribiÃ:
> --On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have
> > migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significantly higher am
--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have
migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significantly higher amount of
churn caused to the community by an SVN migration than was caused by our
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 01:56, Neil Graham wrote:
> I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have
> migrated to SVN so far?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
Is the current complete set of projects migrated, some larger than others.
Niclas
--
+--//
On Oct 19, 2004, at 1:40 AM, Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
This is an update to the existing code that is already there.
It is, I suppose, a new grant of software to an existing community,
so I think that what we need is the grant documentation from Sun*,
have that entered int
Hi David,
>
> So would this be an appropriate time to move the
> xml-commons repository to SVN?
Well, I don't know about you, but I generally prefer to ease my way into
new software tools, rather than dive right into advanced usage. So,
speaking for myself, I'd prefer to wait for a period of
Henry Zongaro wrote:
Hi, Neeraj,
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/14/2004 07:53:26 AM:
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 10:11:00 AM:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ?
Merging
the code in branch/
Hi, Neeraj,
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/14/2004 07:53:26 AM:
> Michael Glavassevich wrote:
>> Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 10:11:00 AM:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ?
Merging
>>> the code
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
>
> I checked on this one, This work involves legal and is being worked with
> legal now.
> I guess this process would take some time so wanted to update the
> community about the status.
So would this be an appropriate time to move the
xml-commons repository to SVN?
--
Da
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I worked on the some of the legal aspects with Eduardo, so going to
jump in here.
On Oct 13, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ?
Merging the code in branch/review/te
I would like to encourage such a move at least for all the license
clean-up this could bring in!! xml-apis, e.g. as distributed by maven,
would finally come with an easy to use pack of licenses!
(and a safe one!)
paul
Le 12 oct. 04, à 14:02, Neeraj Bajaj a écrit :
Hello All,
As most of you a
Hi all,
Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 06:59:22
PM:
> I'm assuming that this is something that XML-Commons/Xerces/Xalan wish
> to do?
Here's a +1 from someone who's committed to Xerces-J and xml-commons. If
either project didn't want to move up to the latest standa
I dropped most of the Cc because this part is now an
issue for XML-Commons and the XML PMC.
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > One thing that we must have this time around, is a
> > version number on the xml-apis.jar filename. [1]
> > I suppose that is an Xml-commons "build" issue.
>
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 10:11:00 AM:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging
the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk
would take time so
David Crossley wrote:
One thing that we must have this time around, is a
version number on the xml-apis.jar filename. [1]
I suppose that is an Xml-commons "build" issue.
By the way, that build system is seriously in need
of improvement,
This is something i can work with you when upgr
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ?
Merging the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk
would take time so at least from my side i would like to see this
work started as early as possible say from
Berin,
Judging from yours, Geir's and David's messages, this sounds like mostly a
matter of clearing the IP (use the template), but is otherwise eagerly
awaited by a community already working with its precursor.
As for where it goes, I think that can be left to the community working with
the code
I worked on the some of the legal aspects with Eduardo, so going to
jump in here.
On Oct 13, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ?
Merging the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main tr
Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging
the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk
would take time so at least from my side i would like to see this work
started as early as possible say from tomorrow. What is the ge
Neeraj Bajaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/13/2004 10:11:00 AM:
> Hello All,
>
> I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging
> the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk
> would take time so at least from my side i would like to see this work
> st
How would client side browsers that did not have or allow java be
impacted?
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Neeraj Bajaj wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging
> the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk
> would take time so at
Hello All,
I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging
the code in branch/review/testing/committing to main trunk
would take time so at least from my side i would like to see this work
started as early as possible say from tomorrow.
What is the general procedure ? I
Ramesh Mandava wrote:
- Both Elliotte's and Clay's questions below are important. If someone
familiar with the code could comment on: For either the main trunk, or
a temporary working branch for integration:
-- What JVM's will this code compile on? Version/Vendors?
J2SE 1.4.x, J2SE 5.0 . We
Michael Glavassevich wrote:
Hello Neeraj,
I think this is a good plan for merging the JAXP 1.3 changes into Xerces.
There's been quite a bit of progress on the XInclude implementation in
CVS, particularly in the last two months, so I imagine it's quite
different than it's state in the
Hi Shane:
A couple of comments:
- Please cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], since xml-commons is the
actual repository that holds the JAXP code.
- Yay! Great progress all, both Xerces/Xalan folks for coordinating,
and Sun folks for getting the process unstuck. 8-)
- Both Elliotte's and Clay's questions below
Hi Elliotte:
Are these APIs and implementation thereof independent of Java 1.5?
i.e. can they be compiled and used in a Java 1.2/1.3/1.4 environment?
If not, could they be backported to work in such environments?
JAXP 1.3 API and RI sources
-Can be compiled with J2SE 1.4 , J2SE 5.0
- Run on J2S
I'd like to alleviate the concern (at least for Xerces-J) there seems to
be about what JVMs and versions will be supported.
Back in January the Xerces-J committers voted [1] to discontinue support
for JDK 1.1 after the Xerces 2.6.1 release. That is something we had held
off doing for a long tim
Shane Curcuru wrote:
A couple of comments:
My knee-jerk reaction is also to hope that it will compile & run on
both recent Sun and IBM JVMs at least before we put this on the main
trunk: we should really try to be JVM-vendor agnostic. (anyone still
working on kaffe? 8-)
Oh yes! :)
cheers,
dalibo
The bottom line for the APIs is "yes for this case, but don't assume it
will necessarily continue to be so". For our specific implementation,
it certainly works for J2SE 1.4, but don't know about 1.3 and below.
Some more details on the API situation. JAXP is bundled in J2SE and in
J2EE. There
A couple of comments:
- Please cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], since xml-commons is the
actual repository that holds the JAXP code.
- Yay! Great progress all, both Xerces/Xalan folks for coordinating,
and Sun folks for getting the process unstuck. 8-)
- Both Elliotte's and Clay's questions below are imp
Hello Neeraj,
I think this is a good plan for merging the JAXP 1.3 changes into Xerces.
There's been quite a bit of progress on the XInclude implementation in
CVS, particularly in the last two months, so I imagine it's quite
different than it's state in the RI. Initially putting the RI on a
se
On Oct 12, 2004, at 5:12 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote:
Are these APIs and implementation thereof independent of Java 1.5?
i.e. can they be compiled and used in a Java 1.2/1.3/1.4 environment?
If not, could they be backported to work in such environments?
-- Elliotte Rusty Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED
Are these APIs and implementation thereof independent of Java 1.5? i.e.
can they be compiled and used in a Java 1.2/1.3/1.4 environment? If not,
could they be backported to work in such environments?
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http:/
Hello All,
As most of you already know JSR 206 [1] JAXP 1.3 has become final. JAXP
1.3 adds lots of new features in the area of XML processing.
It introduces new Schema independent validation framework which decouples
the validation as a process independent from parsing.
It allows t
67 matches
Mail list logo
