Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'd like to start a vote on releasing:
Apache XML Graphics Commons 1.0 from the following branch:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/commons/branches/commons-1_0
+1
and Apache FOP 0.92beta from the following branch:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphic
On 13.04.2006 17:11:37 Peter West wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:37 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 13.04.2006 16:19:08 Peter West wrote:
> >
> > > > The Transcoders use the Graphics2D implementations to render the basic
> > > > graphic elements. Special elements like links, text and more
On Thursday 13 April 2006 21:25, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 13.04.2006 14:58:04 Peter West wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:11 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > That means that
> > changes to Commons have the potential to break both FOP and Batik
> > trunk builds. For those builds on both side
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:37 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 13.04.2006 16:19:08 Peter West wrote:
>
> > > The Transcoders use the Graphics2D implementations to render the basic
> > > graphic elements. Special elements like links, text and more can
> > > optionally handled using special "bridge"
On 13.04.2006 16:19:08 Peter West wrote:
> > The Transcoders use the Graphics2D implementations to render the basic
> > graphic elements. Special elements like links, text and more can
> > optionally handled using special "bridge" classes (SVG/Batik-specific).
> >
> Text which uses either the ba
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 15:25 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 13.04.2006 14:58:04 Peter West wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:11 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > > Ok, I think I'm beginning to see the problem. Looking at the Commons
> > > plan on the wiki it uses the term "transcoder". That's
On 13.04.2006 14:58:04 Peter West wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:11 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Ok, I think I'm beginning to see the problem. Looking at the Commons
> > plan on the wiki it uses the term "transcoder". That's not good. We're
> > planning to move to the PDF and PS/EPS transc
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:11 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Ok, I think I'm beginning to see the problem. Looking at the Commons
> plan on the wiki it uses the term "transcoder". That's not good. We're
> planning to move to the PDF and PS/EPS transcoders to Batik, not to
> Commons (mentioned in par
