DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44887] Thread Safety Problem with FOP 0.93

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44887 --- Comment #1 from Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-28 08:27:03 PST --- Yeah, we know that we use the date and number format classes in a not so good way but so far I can't remember a bug report before. I'm just curious: wh

Re: Branch usage

Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 28.04.2008 12:08:41 Vincent Hennebert wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Jeremias Maerki wrote: >>> On 26.03.2008 18:21:00 Jeremias Maerki wrote: >>> When that's done I think we can do FOP 0.95 final >>> soon thereafter. Is there anything still missing for FOP 0.95 final? >> There wer

Re: Branch usage

On 28.04.2008 12:08:41 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > On 26.03.2008 18:21:00 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > >> I'm going to commit a larger set of changes to FOP Trunk tomorrow > >> morning (the outstanding support for all glyphs in a Type 1 font, now > >> complete with PS

Re: Branch usage

Hi, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 26.03.2008 18:21:00 Jeremias Maerki wrote: >> I'm going to commit a larger set of changes to FOP Trunk tomorrow >> morning (the outstanding support for all glyphs in a Type 1 font, now >> complete with PS support). I just want to check that everyone's fine >> with t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44887] New: Thread Safety Problem with FOP 0.93

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44887 Summary: Thread Safety Problem with FOP 0.93 Product: XMLGraphicsCommons Version: Trunk Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Prior