+1
Vincent
On 26/08/14 16:24, Simon Steiner wrote:
Hi,
Vote to move from Gump to Jenkins for Fop, XGC, Pdf-plugin. This allows us
to control version of checkstyle, also Jenkins is more flexible, has
plugins, we can trigger manually and make changes without asking infra for
help (if workspace
@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
I think this will be a positive move.
Looking at the output at
https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-fop/16/console I see at the end:
findbugs-exec:
[findbugs] Executing findbugs FindBugsTask from ant task
[findbugs] Running
/job/xmlgraphics-fop-pdf-images/
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-commons/
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-fop/
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> Sent: 26 August 2014 16:33
> To: XML Graphics Pr
job/xmlgraphics-commons/
https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-fop/
Thanks
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
Sent: 26 August 2014 16:33
To: XML Graphics Project
Cc: FOP Developers
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
assuming this will pass if it works, can you get the
+1 from me... Sorry to see GUMP go though! Run Forrest! Run! ;-)
On Aug 26, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Simon Steiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vote to move from Gump to Jenkins for Fop, XGC, Pdf-plugin. This allows us to
> control version of checkstyle, also Jenkins is more flexible, has plugins, we
> can trig
+1
Looks good. As I imagine quite a few of us have already used Jenkins, I think
this is only a good thing.
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:52:54 +0200
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
> From: psancho@gmail.com
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
> Hi,
>
> +1, I
ob/xmlgraphics-commons/
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-fop/
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> Sent: 26 August 2014 16:33
> To: XML Graphics Project
> Cc: FOP Developers
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
>
>
]
Sent: 26 August 2014 16:33
To: XML Graphics Project
Cc: FOP Developers
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
assuming this will pass if it works, can you get the jenkins flavor of builds
working first, then we can evaluate the results prior to doing a vote (and
switchover)?
On Tue, Aug 26
assuming this will pass if it works, can you get the jenkins flavor of
builds working first, then we can evaluate the results prior to doing a
vote (and switchover)?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Simon Steiner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Vote to move from Gump to Jenkins for Fop, XGC, Pdf-plugin. T
Hi,
Vote to move from Gump to Jenkins for Fop, XGC, Pdf-plugin. This allows us
to control version of checkstyle, also Jenkins is more flexible, has
plugins, we can trigger manually and make changes without asking infra for
help (if workspace is corrupted we can fix it ourselves).
Fop job:
10 matches
Mail list logo