Hello Taru,
> I might be tempted to apply as a student to GSoC for Genode.
great to know there is actual interest in having us participate. So we
should definitely go for it! .-)
> That is actually quite feasible. The hard issue is interfacing with
> Genode specific interfaces done in C++ since
Hi,
> Two remarks about the two components of your paragraph:
>
> * If I understand you correctly, you propose to broaden the topic to
> anything related to cryptography in Genode, which I'd like to avoid.
> The tasks for summer should be tailored for the expected time frame
> and also addr
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:00:10 +0100, Stefan Kalkowski
wrote:
> On 29.02.2012 13:23, Norman Feske wrote:
> > So what do you think? Do you agree that GSoC participation is a good
> > idea? Are you interested in playing a role in it, as mentor, or student
> > participant? I would be glad about feedba
On 1 March 2012 14:37, Norman Feske wrote:
> Hello Althaf,
>
>> Yes. i vouch for it. However, i have i'm still in doubt regarding the
>> quality of the code produce by the students. Well, not undermining
>> them, however, before merging the GSoC code with the master, i highly
>> recommend a qualit
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:58:13AM +0100, Norman Feske wrote:
> That said, I am uncertain about the motivation you gave. From a
> student's point of view, our needs at Genode Labs may not provide enough
> incentive to go for it. If I were a student, I would prefer working on a
> topic that is
Hello Althaf,
> Yes. i vouch for it. However, i have i'm still in doubt regarding the
> quality of the code produce by the students. Well, not undermining
> them, however, before merging the GSoC code with the master, i highly
> recommend a quality check or defined a quality standard so they can
>
Hi,
> I also read again through http://genode.org/about/challenges and
> http://genode.org/about/road-map. For me, one major goal appropriate
> to tackle during the summer is block-device encryption and I want to
> promote it hereby. To use Genode every day in Genode Labs it's crucial
> to protect
OMG, what a typo!
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 08:49:16AM +0100, Christian Helmuth wrote:
> To use Genode every day in Genode Labs it's crucial
> to protect the confidentiality of some information that's part of the
> Genode code base, e.g., emails and reports.
Certainly, I meant "information that's _
Hey,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:48:34PM +0100, Norman Feske wrote:
> > That may be a huge task. What about porting a non-trivial application to
> > Noux, e.g. binutils?
>
> My gut also tells me that the whole Wifi package is certainly too heavy
> to lift during a GSoC project. But maybe we would
> Whole system statistical profiling might not be possible without kernel
> support, which makes this hard given the number of kernels Genode runs
> on.
well, the CPU session interface provides a facility to query
thread-state information including the program counter. By virtualizing
this interfa
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 21:48 +0100 schrieb Norman Feske:
> Hi,
>
> >> Would it be to daring to propose implementation/port of Intel Wireless
> >> (iwlagn) plus WPA supplicant?
> >
> > That may be a huge task. What about porting a non-trivial application to
> > Noux, e.g. binutils?
>
> My g
Hi,
>> Would it be to daring to propose implementation/port of Intel Wireless
>> (iwlagn) plus WPA supplicant?
>
> That may be a huge task. What about porting a non-trivial application to
> Noux, e.g. binutils?
My gut also tells me that the whole Wifi package is certainly too heavy
to lift durin
Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 16:55 +0100 schrieb Christian Helmuth:
> Hi,
>
> first, I'm definitely available for mentorship as I expect GSoC a
> valuable experience and maybe a booster for our project in sense of
> contributions and attention.
>
> Additionally, I also vote for
>
> On Wed, Feb 2
Hi,
first, I'm definitely available for mentorship as I expect GSoC a
valuable experience and maybe a booster for our project in sense of
contributions and attention.
Additionally, I also vote for
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:00:10PM +0100, Stefan Kalkowski wrote:
> #113 block cache
> #114 vir
On 29.02.2012 13:23, Norman Feske wrote:
> So what do you think? Do you agree that GSoC participation is a good
> idea? Are you interested in playing a role in it, as mentor, or student
> participant? I would be glad about feedback from you.
I think it's a good idea to join GSoC. Especially to get
Yes. i vouch for it. However, i have i'm still in doubt regarding the
quality of the code produce by the students. Well, not undermining
them, however, before merging the GSoC code with the master, i highly
recommend a quality check or defined a quality standard so they can
comply with it.
--
/al
16 matches
Mail list logo
