[gentoo-alt] emerge -e system

2006-10-12 Thread zarck
Fails at python ... i686-apple-darwin8-gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-long-double -no-cpp- precomp -fno-common -DNDEBUG -march=i686 -O2 -pipe -I/gentoo/usr/ include-I. -I./Include -DPy_BUILD_CORE -c ./Modules/ errnomodule.c -o Modules/errnomodule.o i686-apple-darwin8-gcc -fno-strict-alias

Re: [gentoo-alt] Some suggestions for Grobian's instructions

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
In a few seconds I will commit a fixed bootstrap script that works till and including the emerge of sed in the howto. Thanks. On 12-10-2006 12:07:33 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > bugs in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap.xml > > < At this point it might be handy to prepend

Re: [gentoo-alt] collision-protect

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 18:33:31 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > There was a bug in collision-protect that seems to have been fixed > upstream (i.e. unprefixed) that prohibited it from working correctly. This seems to fix the issue of upgrading sed in the bootstrap, so it's in -r7. Thanks! -- Fabian Groff

Re: [gentoo-alt] apply important portage patches in bootstrap

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
Actually... since emerging portage is the first thing you do in the just bootstrapped system (on OSX), you get all patches before your run into problems. Or did you think of the Solaris bootstrap? On 12-10-2006 12:00:20 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Hi, > > why not apply the really imp

Re: [gentoo-alt] collision-protect

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 20:40:01 +0200, Grobian wrote: > On 12-10-2006 20:17:18 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > > The bug was the following: collision-protect only allows packages in > > the same slot as previous versions to overwrite stuff. If you examine > > the original version of the line I replaced, it

Re: [gentoo-alt] collision-protect

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 20:17:18 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > The bug was the following: collision-protect only allows packages in > the same slot as previous versions to overwrite stuff. If you examine > the original version of the line I replaced, it tries to figure out > the slot of the version to be

Re: [gentoo-alt] collision-protect

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 20:17:18 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > > Am 12.10.2006 um 19:48 schrieb Grobian: > > >On 12-10-2006 11:35:41 -0600, Nathan wrote: > >>Yay! Maybe it will work now... > > > >AFAIK the upstream fix was for proper handling of symlinks. > > > >Tobias, your attached patch unusable in any w

Re: [gentoo-alt] collision-protect

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
Am 12.10.2006 um 19:48 schrieb Grobian: On 12-10-2006 11:35:41 -0600, Nathan wrote: Yay! Maybe it will work now... AFAIK the upstream fix was for proper handling of symlinks. Tobias, your attached patch unusable in any way. Maybe that's because I don't know how to create proper patches.

Re: [gentoo-alt] Some suggestions for Grobian's instructions

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
TODO 54a55 cd - 159,165c160,164 < cd ${ROOT}/usr < ${FETCH_COMMAND} "${PORTAGE_URL}/prefix-overlay-$ {PV}.tar.bz2" < bzip2 -dc prefix-overlay-${PV}.tar.bz2 | tar -xf - || exit 1 < mv prefix-overlay portage <

Re: [gentoo-alt] collision-protect

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 11:35:41 -0600, Nathan wrote: > Yay! Maybe it will work now... AFAIK the upstream fix was for proper handling of symlinks. Tobias, your attached patch unusable in any way. > On 10/12/06, Tobias Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >There was a bug in collision-protect that seems to h

Re: [gentoo-alt] collision-protect

2006-10-12 Thread Nathan
Yay! Maybe it will work now... ~ Nathan On 10/12/06, Tobias Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There was a bug in collision-protect that seems to have been fixed upstream (i.e. unprefixed) that prohibited it from working correctly. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-alt] Some suggestions for Grobian's instructions

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 19:15:12 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > > Am 12.10.2006 um 12:07 schrieb Tobias Hahn: > > >bugs in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap.xml > cont.: > > In the current tree, there is no > =automake-1.9.6-r1 > only > =automake-1.9.6-r2 How about: emerge --nodeps "

Re: [gentoo-alt] Some suggestions for Grobian's instructions

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 12:07:33 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > bugs in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap.xml > > < At this point it might be handy to prepend /Library/Gentoo/bin and / > Library/Gentoo/usr/bin to your PATH, otherwise emerge won't be > available, e.g.: > --- > > At th

Re: [gentoo-alt] Some suggestions for Grobian's instructions

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
Am 12.10.2006 um 12:07 schrieb Tobias Hahn: bugs in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap.xml cont.: In the current tree, there is no =automake-1.9.6-r1 only =automake-1.9.6-r2 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 19:06:37 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > >Can anyone test this: > >for i in $(find ${EDEST} | sed -e "s|${EDEST%/}/|/|g") ; do > > doesn't work for me, but > > for i in $(find ${EDEST%/} | sed -e "s|${EDEST%/}/|/|g") ; do > > does ;) And I know why now. See other post. -- Fabian Gr

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 18:32:48 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > $EPREFIX = /gentoo > $ROOT = /gentoo > $EDEST = /gentoo/var/tmp/portage/wget-1.10.2/image/ > $D = /gentoo/var/tmp/portage/wget-1.10.2/image/gentoo mine: EPREFIX: /Library/Gentoo ROOT: /Library/Gentoo/ EDEST: /Library/Gentoo/var/tmp/portage/

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
Can anyone test this: for i in $(find ${EDEST} | sed -e "s|${EDEST%/}/|/|g") ; do doesn't work for me, but for i in $(find ${EDEST%/} | sed -e "s|${EDEST%/}/|/|g") ; do does ;) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-alt] collision-protect

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
There was a bug in collision-protect that seems to have been fixed upstream (i.e. unprefixed) that prohibited it from working correctly. portage_collision_protect_fix.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread zarck
$EPREFIX = /gentoo $ROOT = /gentoo $EDEST = /gentoo/var/tmp/portage/wget-1.10.2/image/ $D = /gentoo/var/tmp/portage/wget-1.10.2/image/gentoo // This is with the "patch" applied (system with latest osx and xcode) On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Grobian wrote: On 12-10-2006 16:04:44 +0200, Tobias

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 17:40:59 +0200, Grobian wrote: > "s|${EDEST}/?|/|g" ? Can anyone test this: for i in $(find ${EDEST} | sed -e "s|${EDEST%/}/|/|g") ; do It seems to work for me/on my system -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-alt] apply important portage patches in bootstrap

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
Basically, because I hope to gain portage commit rights soon, so I just bump the snapshot number... How about that idea? Thanks for the suggestion, though! On 12-10-2006 12:00:20 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Hi, > > why not apply the really important portage patches in bootstrap-script

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread Grobian
On 12-10-2006 16:04:44 +0200, Tobias Hahn wrote: > The following patch for usr/lib/portage/bin/misc-functions.sh fixes > this: > > 197c197 > < for i in $(find ${EDEST} | sed -e "s|${EDEST}|/|g") ; do > --- > > for i in $(find ${EDEST} | sed -e "s|${EDEST}/|/| > g") ;

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread zarck
Can confirm that this fixes the issue (at least with wget) Thanks Tobias Hahn On Oct 12, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Tobias Hahn wrote: The following patch for usr/lib/portage/bin/misc-functions.sh fixes this: 197c197 < for i in $(find ${EDEST} | sed -e "s|${EDEST}|/| g") ; do --- >

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
The following patch for usr/lib/portage/bin/misc-functions.sh fixes this: 197c197 < for i in $(find ${EDEST} | sed -e "s|${EDEST}|/|g") ; do --- > for i in $(find ${EDEST} | sed -e "s|${EDEST}/|/| g") ; do Is there a formal requirement whether variables for direct

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
Stuck with the same problem. Am 12.10.2006 um 11:27 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have narrowed down the problem to portage 2.1.13.4497-r5, (it works with portage that comes with bootstrap and with portage 2.1.13.4497-r1 ) On Oct 11, 2006, at 9:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Code listin

[gentoo-alt] Some suggestions for Grobian's instructions

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
bugs in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap.xml < At this point it might be handy to prepend /Library/Gentoo/bin and / Library/Gentoo/usr/bin to your PATH, otherwise emerge won't be available, e.g.: --- > At this point it might be handy to prepend /Library/Gentoo/bin a

[gentoo-alt] apply important portage patches in bootstrap

2006-10-12 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
Hi, why not apply the really important portage patches in bootstrap-script ? like in attached patch... /haubi/ -- Michael HaubenwallnerSALOMON Automation GmbH Forschung & Entwicklung A-8114 Friesach bei Graz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.salomon.at No

Re: [gentoo-alt] wget (probably a portage issue)

2006-10-12 Thread zarck
I have narrowed down the problem to portage 2.1.13.4497-r5, (it works with portage that comes with bootstrap and with portage 2.1.13.4497-r1 ) On Oct 11, 2006, at 9:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:(Code listing 2.4: emerge wget) $ env FEATURES="-collision-protect" emerge --nodeps wgetresults in ...m

[gentoo-alt] bootstrap bug

2006-10-12 Thread Tobias Hahn
Cannot bootstrap tree, patch attached. 160c160 < ${FETCH_COMMAND} "${PORTAGE_URL}/prefix-overlay-$ {PV}.tar.bz2" --- > fetch ${PORTAGE_URL}/prefix-overlay-${PV}.tar.bz2 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list