On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Nicolas Pinto <nicolas.pi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was indeed using USE=vanilla to get gcc 4.5.3 to compile and it > appears that all my issues where caused by this useflag. > > So I removed this useflag and masked >sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r01.
You shouldn't need to mask it (anymore), see bug 289757. Please test if you have time. -Jeremy > > Thanks a lot! > > Regards, > > Nicolas > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Fabian Groffen <grob...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 23-10-2011 23:36:12 -0400, Martin Luessi wrote: >>> Did you by any chance emerge gcc with the "vanilla" useflag enabled? I >>> am asking since I had similar problems when I was installing >>> gentoo-prefix on CentOS a few weeks ago. Gcc 4.5.3 wouldn't compile >>> without the "vanilla" useflag enabled, so I enabled it. After that >>> many packages failed to compile since they were being linked against >>> system libraries instead of the prefix ones. What I did is mask gcc >>> versions that are too new (>4.2.4 in my case) to be compatible with >>> the CentOs glibc. >> >> Oh, thanks for the hint. I guess we should either mask vanilla, or >> apply the critial prefix patches for this regardless of USE=vanilla. >> >> Mind filing a bug for this? >> >> Thanks a lot for the insight! >> >> >> -- >> Fabian Groffen >> Gentoo on a different level >> > > > > -- > Nicolas Pinto > http://web.mit.edu/pinto >
