On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:20:22AM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:09 AM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > Also, in Jeremy's bootstrap-gentoo post [1], I think you need…
>
> …
> However, that guide isn't for people that aren't deeply involved
> with Gentoo Linux development, hence
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:09 AM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> Also, in Jeremy's bootstrap-gentoo post [1], I think you need
>
> $ ./bootstrap-prefix.sh $EPREFIX latest_tree
>
> before
>
> $ ./bootstrap-prefix.sh $EPREFIX portage
>
> in code listing 1.3, otherwise there's no local tree there to do
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:37:25AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> The profiles differ, and as Jeremy explained, most of @system packages
> are Prefix modified versions. See also:
> http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay
Right, thanks.
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:11:5
On 23-07-2012 14:36:57 -0400, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:07:57PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > The tree is different, so while it sounds reasonable, in reality it is
> > not. Sorry.
>
> Ah, thanks for pointing that out. For some reason I thought that after
>
> On Sun,
