On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> I needed to add the profile for ia64. After that, initial bootstrap
> went fine (build portage & baselayout-prefix). Then 148 of the 150
The ia64 profile is there, what went wrong exactly?
-Jeremy
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:38:13 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Burcin Erocal
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:29:00 -0600
> > Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> >
> >> Fabian and I discussed dropping ia64-linux support. Time to face
> >> reality, we don't use it and we don't te
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:29:00 -0600
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>
>> Fabian and I discussed dropping ia64-linux support. Time to face
>> reality, we don't use it and we don't test it... Does anyone out there
>> care about ia64-linux?
>
> I do. :)
>
On 16-11-2011 16:07:26 +0100, Askar Bektassov (Аскар Бектасов) wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> Is there any possibility to see the usage statistics of the downloaded
> files?
Basically no. Even if you can see how many times a file is downloaded
from a mirror, you cannot tell whether that user is a Prefix a
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:29:00 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Fabian and I discussed dropping ia64-linux support. Time to face
> reality, we don't use it and we don't test it... Does anyone out there
> care about ia64-linux?
I do. :)
There are still many scientific users who have itanium boxes left
Jeremy,
Is there any possibility to see the usage statistics of the downloaded
files?
Maybe, this can turn out to be one of possible ways to see the actual
demand for ia64-linux. Just to have a quantitative evidence of what we are
dropping (qualitative is already there, "we don't use it and we do
Fabian and I discussed dropping ia64-linux support. Time to face
reality, we don't use it and we don't test it... Does anyone out there
care about ia64-linux?
-Jeremy
