Re: [gentoo-amd64] version bump

2005-03-23 Thread Brian Hall
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:01:15PM +, Simon Stelling wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Brian Hall wrote: > >I often submit bug reports to indicate that a package works > >~amd64; what is the procedure (or is there one) for indicating > >that the next version of a package of an

[gentoo-amd64] version bump

2005-03-23 Thread Brian Hall
I often submit bug reports to indicate that a package works ~amd64; what is the procedure (or is there one) for indicating that the next version of a package of an existing ~amd64 package works (version bump) ? -- Brian Hall Linux Consultant http://pcisys.net/~brihall -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-amd64] large temp difference on dual amd

2005-01-25 Thread Brian Hall
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:53:41PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Brian Hall wrote: > > > To keep the fans from staying at max speed, you have to use the "init=0" > > parameter. Contents of my /etc/conf.d/lm_sensors: > > > > MODULE_0=i2c-viapro >

Re: [gentoo-amd64] large temp difference on dual amd

2005-01-25 Thread Brian Hall
ts of my /etc/conf.d/lm_sensors: MODULE_0=i2c-viapro MODULE_1=i2c-isa #MODULE_2=w83627hf MODULE_2=w83781d MODULE_2_ARGS="init=0" You can use either w83627hf or w83781d for the sensor module on this board (MSI K8T Master2 FAR). -- Brian Hall Linux Consultant http://pcisys.net/~brihall -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list