[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: 2005.0 profile testing

2005-02-01 Thread Duncan
Duncan posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:04:10 -0700: > I'm attempting to remerge gcc now, to see if that fixes the problem. If > it doesn't, now that I know why PAN was freezing when I tried to post the > error, I can post the unexcised version. OK, for those

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: 2005.0 profile testing

2005-01-23 Thread Duncan
Jeremy Huddleston posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:11:51 -0800: > On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 10:35 -0700, Duncan wrote: >> OK, got gcc-config straightened out and it changes profiles as it >> should, now, but I'm still getting this error. I suspect something else >>

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: 2005.0 profile testing

2005-01-21 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
> Ahh... I didn't see anything about any gcc-wrapper. That might be what > I'm missing. You don't mean gcc-config, do you? It is/was merged b4 the > profile switch, but I don't know anything nor have I seen anything in the > guide about gcc-wrapper. gcc-config is what I meant. Do you have 1.3.

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: 2005.0 profile testing

2005-01-21 Thread Duncan
Jeremy Huddleston posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:38:07 -0800: > Ok, it sounds like you misunderstood a step or something here. You need > to emerge gcc/portage/baselayout/gcc-wrapper before the profile switch, > and glibc after. the i686 version of glibc won

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: 2005.0 profile testing

2005-01-21 Thread Duncan
Octavio Ruiz (Ta^3) posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:39:37 -0600: > Duncan, who happens to be smarter than you, thinks: >> Jeremy Huddleston posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> excerpted below, on Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:43:52 -0800: >> >> > Additionally, the upgrade g

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: 2005.0 profile testing

2005-01-15 Thread Sean Dague
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:36:31PM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 00:16 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > > This generates the following failure: > > > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=linux-headers-2.6.8.1-r4" have been > > masked. > > !!! One of the following masked pack