On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 11:37:08 +0200
ViNiL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duncan, thanks for your tips! I used my favourite trick: download
> stage2 + tarball, chroot, quickpkg glibc, exit, emerge -avK glibc...
>
> Ian Hastie wrote:
> > This sounds like a problem that I had once with an early
> > gli
Simon Stelling posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Mon, 08 Aug 2005 21:20:17 +0200:
> Duncan wrote:
>>>Just a personal note on this: What's the point in repeating everything?
>>>You only bore people with it. I think we can assume that the original
>>>poster either gets it the first ti
We're on a roll :)
Welcome.
On 8/9/05, Luis Medinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Homer Parker wrote:
>
> > I know, it was just a few days ago, but... Let's welcome the 2 latest
> >amd64 ATs to the team.. First, we have AJ Armstrong (aja). We also have
> >José Carlos Cruz Costa (meetra) join
Matt Randolph posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:04:54 -0400:
> Simon Stelling wrote:
>
>> First, I didn't really want to offend you, although I have to admit that
>> a few statements were rather harsh. I didn't feel offended, and I know
>> you didn't want to say
Homer Parker wrote:
I know, it was just a few days ago, but... Let's welcome the 2 latest
amd64 ATs to the team.. First, we have AJ Armstrong (aja). We also have
José Carlos Cruz Costa (meetra) joining us.. Congratz!!
Congrats guys. May the force be with you!
--
Luis Medinas <[EMAI
Jan Jitse Venselaar skrev:
As the reporter of the problem with nano, I'd like to make 1 correction to
this report: Recompiling nano and its depencies did not fix the crashes. It
just fixed the eating of the file.
I did not recompile my entire system, but a crash of such a small and basic
app
Homer Parker wrote:
I know, it was just a few days ago, but... Let's welcome the 2 latest
amd64 ATs to the team.. First, we have AJ Armstrong (aja). We also have
José Carlos Cruz Costa (meetra) joining us.. Congratz!!
Yay, even more bugs! ;)
Welcome to the team!
--
Simon Stelling
Gent
> With 2005.1, I'm expecting FEATURES=multilib-strict will be the default,
> to finally weed out as many of the few remaining back packages as
> possible.
I don't suspect that will be "default" as I'd rather not burden users
with those problems that should be caught by developers. Before we make
