Hi,
Brian Litzinger wrote:
Exception: Unable to pull EAPI from cpv net-dns/jbigkit-1.6-r1, tree
porttree; can't confirm that it's supported by this portage, thus unable
to merge it: Exception was '"'net-dns/jbigkit-1.6-r1' at None"'
Looks like this has something to do with the lately added EAP
Hemmann, Volker Armin posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:28:01 +0200:
> On Wednesday 05 October 2005 05:40, Jared Lindsay wrote:
>> Eh? Like to destroy filesystems? Not sure what nitro you're talking
>> about...
>>
>>
> I am not sure if it was nitro, love or any o
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 15:08, Brian Litzinger wrote:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 3202, in ?
> mydepgraph.merge(pkglist)
> File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 1848, in merge
>
> retval=portage.doebuild(y,"clean",myroot,self.pkgsettings,edebug,cleanu
Hi,
ok, coaranm aside - have you EVER seen a dev recommending love- or
nitro-sources?
I have not! Never! Never ever!
There seems to be a reason that a) no dev has recommended them so far and b)
they are not in portage.
And puulease.. nitro is nothing more than
ck+bootsplash+someotherunneeded
Hemmann, Volker Armin posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 19:26:49 +0200:
> ok, coaranm aside - have you EVER seen a dev recommending love- or
> nitro-sources?
>
> I have not! Never! Never ever!
>
> There seems to be a reason that a) no dev has recommended them so f
On Wed, 2005-05-10 at 19:26 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok, coaranm aside - have you EVER seen a dev recommending love- or
> nitro-sources?
>
> [...]
>
> If you want the 'latency enhancement' of nitro, go directly to ck - Con
> Kolivas knows what he does.
The official party l
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 20:01, Olivier Crete wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-10 at 19:26 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ok, coaranm aside - have you EVER seen a dev recommending love- or
> > nitro-sources?
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > If you want the 'latency enhancement' of nitro, go d
Yep, nitro is "only" ck + bootsplash + some other stuff. And
guess what? That's why I use it, and not ck! I have
never had any problems with it, and I find it to be a better patchset
than gentoo-sources. I only wish it was updated more often, but
the maintainer is pretty busy right now.
And I
Jared Lindsay posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:54:38 -0700:
>
> And I don't care a whole lot that nitro is unsupported. The dev I
> asked on the issue simply said they don't want to have to provide
> support for tons of kernel patchsets, which I agree they sho
On Thursday 06 October 2005 07:19, Duncan wrote:
> Jared Lindsay posted
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
>
> below, on Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:54:38 -0700:
> >
> > And I don't care a whole lot that nitro is unsupported. The dev I
> > asked on the issue simply said they don't want to have to provide
10 matches
Mail list logo
