[gentoo-amd64] Re: OFF-TOPIC but ... you will lough !!!

2005-11-03 Thread Duncan
Billy Holmes posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:16:54 -0500: > Herman Roozenbeek wrote: >> The same goes for me... But I really can't believe that nobody at >> Microsoft knows why this is so. Unless Linux-users know more about >> Microsoft's history than Microso

Re: [gentoo-amd64] OFF-TOPIC but ... you will lough !!!

2005-11-03 Thread Chris Smart
mkdir \\.\c:\con but yeah, this is commandline.. Good example of crappy microsoft coding methods - no wonder Longhorn / Vista collapsed on itself. -c -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] OFF-TOPIC but ... you will lough !!!

2005-11-03 Thread Billy Holmes
Herman Roozenbeek wrote: The same goes for me... But I really can't believe that nobody at Microsoft knows why this is so. Unless Linux-users know more about Microsoft's history than Microsoft itself does. ;-) I have several theories: (1) they want to forget about DOS, and want us to do the s

Re: [gentoo-amd64] OFF-TOPIC but ... you will lough !!!

2005-11-03 Thread Herman Roozenbeek
Billy Holmes wrote: Nuitari wrote: The whole list of forbidden names (from memory): aux (eg ttyS0), prn (eg lp0), com1 to com4, lpt1 to lpt3, con, nul and clock$ beat me to it.. and you have a better memory than I... The same goes for me... But I really can't believe that nobody at Micr

Re: [gentoo-amd64] OFF-TOPIC but ... you will lough !!!

2005-11-03 Thread Billy Holmes
Nuitari wrote: The whole list of forbidden names (from memory): aux (eg ttyS0), prn (eg lp0), com1 to com4, lpt1 to lpt3, con, nul and clock$ beat me to it.. and you have a better memory than I... -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Get synaptics touchpad to work after initial installation

2005-11-03 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 10:39 +0100, Michal Žeravík wrote: > If you have synaptic touchpad, you need device manager. > At least what I've tried on notebook. Compile it into kernel. > I afraid that you can't get touchpad working unless it's enabled. > No, you need the input device event interface (

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Old topic comes round again: -Ox optimizations.

2005-11-03 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Thursday 03 November 2005 16:27, Duncan wrote: > Hemmann, Volker Armin posted > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > > below, on Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:22:03 +0100: > > Os is 'forbidden' for glibc, because there were some gcc bugs, that > > miscompiled glibc with Os. > > I've actually run an -Os compi

Re: [gentoo-amd64] linux32 or chroot

2005-11-03 Thread Billy Holmes
Nuitari wrote: I'd much prefer to keep the actual /home data outside of the chroot. You could mount -bind the /home into the chroot like you do with /tmp. yes, this was probably the smartest way to do it, however, I had already sliced up my partitions and /home had the largest available. This

Re: [gentoo-amd64] linux32 or chroot

2005-11-03 Thread Nuitari
in my 32-bit chroot, I've created symlinks from the main /home/ for all the users directories to point into the 32-bit chroot, I also bound /tmp (mount -bind) into the 32-bit chroot, as well as the root home directory /root. This gives me the advantage of switching in and out of the chroot, whil

Re: [gentoo-amd64] linux32 or chroot

2005-11-03 Thread Antoine Martin
> Some programs mistakenly try and link to the 64-bit libs first, even if > the 32-bit libs are available. I've had to create nasty LD_LIBRARY_PATH > statements, and mess around with the order in ld.so.conf to get things > to semi work. It would be good to identify those and get them fixed upstr

Re: [gentoo-amd64] linux32 or chroot

2005-11-03 Thread Billy Holmes
sean wrote: So would a chroot environment perhaps help with the problem apps? I am sure I am not the first on this path, so how have some you done who have tried these games? I've always found that the chroot just makes things work easier. Yes, you have a large investment period (creating the

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Old topic comes round again: -Ox optimizations.

2005-11-03 Thread Duncan
Hemmann, Volker Armin posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:22:03 +0100: > Os is 'forbidden' for glibc, because there were some gcc bugs, that > miscompiled glibc with Os. I've actually run an -Os compiled glibc here (hacked the ebuild to remove the filterflags/rep

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Old topic comes round again: -Ox optimizations.

2005-11-03 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Thursday 03 November 2005 09:47, Duncan wrote: > > So... certainly for kernel and probably for glibc stuff (tho I believe > Gentoo kills -Os on glibc compiles unless you hack out that portion of the > ebuild, in your own overlay or whatever), -Os is likely to be the best > choice. For most of

[gentoo-amd64] printing from abiword: Error: ttftool: Incomplete TTF file

2005-11-03 Thread Mihai Rusu
Hi there I have a problem which from what I have been able to google it seems to be 64bit related. I have a Gentoo/x86_64 system and abiword-2.2.11 installed (-debug -gnome +jpeg -spell +xml2). I have found a mail thread on a debian mailing list with the same problem at: http://lists.debian.or

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Get synaptics touchpad to work after initial installation

2005-11-03 Thread Michal Žeravík
Patrick McLean wrote: Michal Žeravík wrote: Antoine Martin wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 07:45 -0500, Mark Haney wrote: I did something kind of stupid, when I first installed Gentoo, I left my usb optical mouse connected to my laptop. After install that mouse works fine, but the synaptics

[gentoo-amd64] Old topic comes round again: -Ox optimizations.

2005-11-03 Thread Duncan
The topic of the usefulness of various -Ox optimizations comes up every so often. This will likely be old news to Gentoo old hands, but it should be useful for newbies, at least. Anyway, I found this commentary by Linus interesting: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/30 The threa