On Saturday 11 February 2006 20:39, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Saturday 11 February 2006 18:41, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Hello,
> >Just in the last week or so my AMD64 machine has started to
> > exhibit problems with the clock. Maybe it's a hardware problem, or
> > possibly it's some new n
On Monday 13 February 2006 10:04, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> >
> > it does not really matter which one you choose.
>
> Local clock has issues with daylight saving time, so if possible (i.a. no
> windows on the machine, or you don't care about it's clock) use UTC time
> in the hardware clock. UTC tim
For those using modular-x, has anyone run into bug 121394 [1], window
corruption if CFLAGS include -fweb?
The latest xorg-server-1.0.1-r3 does a filterflags -fweb as a result.
However, I've not experienced the issue here. The bug (and resulting
filterflags) is based on reports in the forums, app
Hemmann, Volker Armin posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:34:19 +0100:
> well, I am living in the MET timezone.
LOL! For a moment I read that as "the NET timezone"!
I suppose that'd have to be Swatch's 1000-beat/day time, which is
zeroed on UTC.
--
Duncan - Li
Is your /etc/localtime points to the right time zone ?
e.g, for me
/etc/localtime -> /usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada/Mountain
> On Monday 13 February 2006 10:04, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
>
> > >
> > > it does not really matter which one you choose.
> >
> > Local clock has issues with dayli
Duncan wrote:
> I suppose that'd have to be Swatch's 1000-beat/day time, which is
> zeroed on UTC.
Wrong, it's zeroed on CE(S)T, as Switzerland (since Swatch is a swiss company)
lies within that time zone.
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-amd64@gent
On Monday 13 February 2006 14:49, Duncan wrote:
> For those using modular-x, has anyone run into bug 121394 [1], window
> corruption if CFLAGS include -fweb?
>
> The latest xorg-server-1.0.1-r3 does a filterflags -fweb as a result.
> However, I've not experienced the issue here. The bug (and resul
Hi,
I am using:
gcc 3.4.5
-fweb as one of my flags.
And I have never seen any window corruptions on my maschine.
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 13 February 2006 22:51, Harm Geerts wrote:
>
> OT:
> My emerge --info keeps getting longer as I expand my systems default
> environment. Is it really necessary for emerge --info to include all this,
> is there a way to filter it? When I run emerge --info as a regular user in
> the portag
Harm Geerts wrote:
> # emerge --info
[snip]
It is only that verbose when you emerge -v --info. Is emerge a alias for emerge
-v?
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 13 February 2006 23:09, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Harm Geerts wrote:
> > # emerge --info
>
> [snip]
>
> It is only that verbose when you emerge -v --info. Is emerge a alias for
> emerge -v?
Doh, I should have thought about that myself :+
Thanks Simon
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing li
On Monday 13 Feb 2006 00:40, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 01:02, Guy Harrison wrote:
> > Atm I'm loathed to play around (still need this box from work). For
> > the apps I know the name of, if I launch them from a console, up they
> > come with settings intact.
> >
> >
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 00:26, Guy Harrison wrote:
>
>
> Anyway, can you confirm it is kicker I'm describing or not please? While
> it's working I'd like to understand what the settings should be lest it
> happen again.
>
no,
kicker is the fat menubar, what you mean/call 'startbar' is the k-m
13 matches
Mail list logo
