Re: [gentoo-amd64] I don't want mplayer-bin to play vmw files!

2006-06-11 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 12 June 2006 02:34, Jerônimo Backes wrote: > I tried that, but I doesn't work, because some 32 bit libraries are not > found. The app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* packages contain some of the 32 bit libraries. Did you investigate if the missing libraries are contained in any of those? -

Re: [gentoo-amd64] I don't want mplayer-bin to play vmw files!

2006-06-11 Thread Fernando Boaglio
I just use KPlayer GUI of mplayer-bin, it works like a charm. =) On 6/11/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/11/06, Jerônimo Backes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: > > > > You might consider a 32-bit chroot. I use one for web sites that are > > picky about Flash, Java

Re: [gentoo-amd64] I don't want mplayer-bin to play vmw files!

2006-06-11 Thread Mark Knecht
On 6/11/06, Jerônimo Backes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: > > You might consider a 32-bit chroot. I use one for web sites that are > picky about Flash, Java, win32codec support, etc. > > Good luck, > Mark Okay, that will surely work. But a 32-chroot (I never did that) doesn't requ

Re: [gentoo-amd64] I don't want mplayer-bin to play vmw files!

2006-06-11 Thread Jerônimo Backes
Mark Knecht wrote: You might consider a 32-bit chroot. I use one for web sites that are picky about Flash, Java, win32codec support, etc. Good luck, Mark Okay, that will surely work. But a 32-chroot (I never did that) doesn't require (basically) a new gentoo installation? I think that's too mu

Re: [gentoo-amd64] I don't want mplayer-bin to play vmw files!

2006-06-11 Thread Jerônimo Backes
Sebastian Redl wrote: you can always just download a 32-bit binary of xine and a player based on it, and use that. Ought to work without problems. I tried that, but I doesn't work, because some 32 bit libraries are not found. __

Re: [gentoo-amd64] I don't want mplayer-bin to play vmw files!

2006-06-11 Thread Mark Knecht
On 6/11/06, Jerônimo Backes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a amd64 machine, with a 64-bit installation. And I HATE mplayer. I don't want to use it to play movies, but for the wmv and other formats only supported by win32codecs, I have no options. There's only the 32 bit version of mplayer avai

Re: [gentoo-amd64] I don't want mplayer-bin to play vmw files!

2006-06-11 Thread Sebastian Redl
Jerônimo Backes wrote: I have a amd64 machine, with a 64-bit installation. And I HATE mplayer. I don't want to use it to play movies, but for the wmv and other formats only supported by win32codecs, I have no options. There's only the 32 bit version of mplayer available, and only a 32 bit pla

[gentoo-amd64] I don't want mplayer-bin to play vmw files!

2006-06-11 Thread Jerônimo Backes
I have a amd64 machine, with a 64-bit installation. And I HATE mplayer. I don't want to use it to play movies, but for the wmv and other formats only supported by win32codecs, I have no options. There's only the 32 bit version of mplayer available, and only a 32 bit player can use win32codecs.

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problems after upgrading to 4GB Ram

2006-06-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag 11 Juni 2006 20:10 schrieb Nuitari: > >> Thanks for the suggestion. They are 4 matching 1GB sticks from Crucial. > >> It's worked perfectly today with any 2 of them - just not when I fit all > >> 4. > >> > >> It didn't work *at all* when I first put in 4GB, I had to recompile the > >> ke

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problems after upgrading to 4GB Ram

2006-06-11 Thread Nuitari
Thanks for the suggestion. They are 4 matching 1GB sticks from Crucial. It's worked perfectly today with any 2 of them - just not when I fit all 4. It didn't work *at all* when I first put in 4GB, I had to recompile the kernel with IOMMU options - now it works, just not under "load". I ran int

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Re: gcc 4.1 + CFLAGS

2006-06-11 Thread Barry . SCHWARTZ
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Static libraries, OTOH, have the .a extension and > are collected and archived using shar (originally referring to > shell-archive, just like tar originally referred to tape-archive). Then "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Static libraries are

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Problems after upgrading to 4GB Ram

2006-06-11 Thread Duncan
"Richard Lucking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:35:33 +0100: > Thanks for the suggestion. They are 4 matching 1GB sticks from Crucial. It's > worked perfectly today with any 2 of them - just not when I fit all 4. > > It didn't work *at all

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Re: gcc 4.1 + CFLAGS

2006-06-11 Thread Duncan
"Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 11 Jun 2006 09:11:09 -0700: > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 14:33 +, Duncan wrote: > >> Static libraries, OTOH, have the .a extension and >> are collected and archived using shar (originally referring to >>

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: gcc 4.1 + CFLAGS

2006-06-11 Thread Vladimir G. Ivanovic
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 14:33 +, Duncan wrote: > Static libraries, OTOH, have the .a extension and > are collected and archived using shar (originally referring to > shell-archive, just like tar originally referred to tape-archive). > Static libraries are created and manipulated with 'ar', not

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: gcc 4.1 + CFLAGS

2006-06-11 Thread Duncan
Samir Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:09:00 +0400: > Duncan wrote: >> A couple questions: >> >> -mcmodel=medium: Here's the gcc 4.1.1 manpage entry: >> >> -mcmodel=medium >> [] Programs can be statically or dynamically linked, but >>

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problems after upgrading to 4GB Ram

2006-06-11 Thread Richard Freeman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Lucking wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. They are 4 matching 1GB sticks from Crucial. > It's worked perfectly today with any 2 of them - just not when I fit all 4. > > It didn't work *at all* when I first put in 4GB, I had to recompile t

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problems after upgrading to 4GB Ram

2006-06-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag 11 Juni 2006 01:36 schrieb Tony Johnson: > On Sunday 11 June 2006 08:04, Richard Lucking wrote: > > I've got a Gigabyte GA-K8NSC-939 motherboard, which had 2GB of memory, > > and worked perfectly. I upgraded to 4GB, and have spent the last 24 hours > > trying to get everything to work ag

Re: [gentoo-amd64] totem is not starting

2006-06-11 Thread Bernhard Auzinger
Am Sonntag 11 Juni 2006 09:16 schrieb Bernhard Auzinger: > I had similar problems when I was upgrading my memory. Finally it was a > known issue with the Winchester's memory controller. It can't handle fast > timings in dual channel mode, when all memory banks are filled. So I > switched to a slowe