I found that this bug is already reported:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152544
On 10/25/06, Bob Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe Ribeiro, mused, then expounded:
> Have anyone had problems while compiling cyrus-sasl?
> I got this:
Yes. But there are a couple of open bugs tha
Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:04:43 +0300:
> What about enabling those extensions via C[XX]FLAGS? Is this still a bad
> idea?
In most cases, not necessarily bad, but redundant. A properly set -march=
will take care of the CFLA
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 13:52, Mark Haney wrote:
> Where exactly is KDE 3.5.4 now? I installed it while it was masked, but
> now in ~amd64 is KDE 3.5.5, but when I look at unmasked KDE packages
> it's still showing 3.5.2.
>
> Is it safe to go back down to 3.5.2? Or is there some way to get t
Simon Stelling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Back in May 2005 we made the decision to not use the assembler USE
> flags because AMD64 was not affected by the "lots of sub-arches"
> problem and instead just enable SIMD code where possible. As a result
> of this, the 3dnow, 3dnowext, mmx, mmxext, sse and sse2
Felipe Ribeiro, mused, then expounded:
> Have anyone had problems while compiling cyrus-sasl?
> I got this:
Yes. But there are a couple of open bugs that look about the
same. Nothing in them helped me.
Bob
>
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
> ..
Have anyone had problems while compiling cyrus-sasl?
I got this:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
../sasldb/.libs/libsasldb.a(allockey.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S
against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object;
recompile with -fP
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:18:40 +0200
Charly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gcc: spec failure: unrecognized spec option 'v'
>...
Search bugs.gentoo.org. Look at bugs #73368 and #109266.
--
Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Charly,
We use our bug tracking system for such things. Please open a bug report
on http://bugs.gentoo.org/. The mailing list is not really suited for
bugs as it is intended as a discussion forum.
Thanks in advance,
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 developer
--
gentoo-amd64@g
Rado Ramarotafika wrote:
Why don't you use 3.5.5 ? I use it everyday and it works like a charm.
No particular reason, maybe I"ll give that a shot instead.
--
Ceterum censeo, Carthago delenda est.
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 14:52, Mark Haney wrote:
> Where exactly is KDE 3.5.4 now? I installed it while it was masked, but
> now in ~amd64 is KDE 3.5.5, but when I look at unmasked KDE packages
> it's still showing 3.5.2.
>
> Is it safe to go back down to 3.5.2? Or is there some way to get t
Why don't you use 3.5.5 ? I use it everyday and it works like a charm.2006/10/25, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Where exactly is KDE 3.5.4 now? I installed it while it was masked, butnow in ~amd64 is KDE 3.5.5, but when I look at unmasked KDE packagesit's still showing 3.5.2.Is it safe to go bac
Where exactly is KDE 3.5.4 now? I installed it while it was masked, but
now in ~amd64 is KDE 3.5.5, but when I look at unmasked KDE packages
it's still showing 3.5.2.
Is it safe to go back down to 3.5.2? Or is there some way to get the
3.5.4 packages?
--
Ceterum censeo, Carthago delenda es
Pawel Kraszewski wrote:
XEON 3.2 HT EM64T I have at work says:
fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni
monitor ds_cpl cid cx16 xtpr
Seems it has no mmxext (which IS mentioned at my home
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:30:41 -0700
"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/24/06, Mauro Maroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 October 2006 14:52, Rodrigo Gnoatto Amaral wrote:
> > > Xmms was Hard Masked.
> > > It's being removed from the portage tree.
> > > Gentoo people sug
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 14:18, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> /var/db/pkg contains info about what is installed. If you lose it in the
> best case `emerge -e world` will regenerate it. In the worst case you may
> need to reinstall. It has nothing to do with the metadata which are
> located in $POR
Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis:
> On 10/24/06, Mauro Maroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tuesday 24 October 2006 14:52, Rodrigo Gnoatto Amaral wrote:
> >> Xmms was Hard Masked.
> >> It's being removed from the portage tree.
> >> Gentoo people suggested to use Audacious instead.
> >
>
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 17:25, Richard Fish wrote:
> By default dar uses an arbitrary-precision integer implementation to
> handle archives of basically any size. But it takes more memory and
> CPU cycles to use, so you can compile dar with dar32 or dar64 to use
> 32-bit or 64-bit integers in
On 10/24/06, Mauro Maroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 14:52, Rodrigo Gnoatto Amaral wrote:
> Xmms was Hard Masked.
> It's being removed from the portage tree.
> Gentoo people suggested to use Audacious instead.
Does anyone know if audacious is able to open cue sheets?
I
18 matches
Mail list logo
