Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Multilib or not?

2008-11-26 Thread Tonko
It looks like I don't use any 32 bit app so I made the switch to the no-multilib profile. Only 1 question remains (atm actually :P) : Can I just remove the /lib32 and the /usr/lib32 dirs? On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tonko [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL

[gentoo-amd64] quadcore

2008-11-26 Thread Fernando Boaglio
Hi, I'm updating my old machine (AMD64 - 4200+ X2) with a AMD Phenon 9550 quadcore + mobo Asus M3A78. Should my make.conf still remains the same? =) []'s Fernando Boaglio

Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore

2008-11-26 Thread Bob Sanders
Fernando Boaglio, mused, then expounded: Hi, I'm updating my old machine (AMD64 - 4200+ X2) with a AMD Phenon 9550 quadcore + mobo Asus M3A78. Should my make.conf still remains the same? =) Yes. Only bump up you -j setting. Here's what I use for the 3-core 8450 - CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe

Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore

2008-11-26 Thread Sebastian Klüsener
I'd change that to 'march=amdfam10' or 'march=native' if your gcc is a recent one. Recent means =4.3. - Original Message - From: Bob Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 4:42 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore Fernando

Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore

2008-11-26 Thread Bob Sanders
Sebastian Klüsener, mused, then expounded: I'd change that to 'march=amdfam10' or 'march=native' if your gcc is a recent one. Recent means =4.3. True. I'm running stable - 4.1.2, thus that option isn't available. Bob - Original Message - From: Bob Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore

2008-11-26 Thread Wil Reichert
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Bob Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sebastian Klüsener, mused, then expounded: I'd change that to 'march=amdfam10' or 'march=native' if your gcc is a recent one. Recent means =4.3. True. I'm running stable - 4.1.2, thus that option isn't available. Native

Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore

2008-11-26 Thread Beso
2008/11/26 Sebastian Klüsener [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd change that to 'march=amdfam10' or 'march=native' if your gcc is a recent one. Recent means =4.3. please don't top post. second, what does march=native does?! -- dott. ing. beso

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Multilib or not?

2008-11-26 Thread Tonko Mulder
Op woensdag 26-11-2008 om 14:37 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Duncan: Tonko [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:10:51 +0100: It looks like I don't use any 32 bit app so I made the switch to the no-multilib profile. Only 1 question remains

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Multilib or not?

2008-11-26 Thread Beso
2008/11/26 Tonko Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Op woensdag 26-11-2008 om 14:37 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Duncan: Tonko [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:10:51 +0100: It looks like I don't use any 32 bit app so I made the switch to the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] quadcore

2008-11-26 Thread Branko Badrljica
Eduardo Schoedler wrote: SNIP Hi Beso. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html#i386-and-x86_002d64-Options native This selects the CPU to tune for at compilation time by determining the processor type of the compiling machine. Using -mtune=native

[gentoo-amd64] Optimal AMD64 CFLAGS ?

2008-11-26 Thread Branko Badrljica
ONe fo my machines still has K8 - AMD64 X2 6000+ in it. cat /proc/cpuinfo doesn't list SSE3 capabilities of the CPU, whereas AMD states that newer AMD64 (2005 and after that) are SSE3 capable and gcc-4.3.2 has -march=k8-sse3 Wikipedia states that AMD K8 is SSE3 capable, except for a few

[gentoo-amd64] Re: quadcore

2008-11-26 Thread Duncan
Wil Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:47:25 -0800: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Bob Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sebastian Klüsener, mused, then expounded: I'd change that to 'march=amdfam10' or 'march=native' if your gcc is a

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Multilib or not?

2008-11-26 Thread Duncan
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:34:25 +: As a result of the switch my lvm2 init script started complaining that it is written for baselayout 2 (which I'm running by the way) and fails to start. I re-emerged lvm2, but that didn't

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Optimal AMD64 CFLAGS ?

2008-11-26 Thread Morgan Wesström
Branko Badrljica wrote: ONe fo my machines still has K8 - AMD64 X2 6000+ in it. cat /proc/cpuinfo doesn't list SSE3 capabilities of the CPU, whereas AMD states that newer AMD64 (2005 and after that) are SSE3 capable and gcc-4.3.2 has -march=k8-sse3 Wikipedia states that AMD K8 is SSE3

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Optimal AMD64 CFLAGS ?

2008-11-26 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag 27 November 2008, Branko Badrljica wrote: ONe fo my machines still has K8 - AMD64 X2 6000+ in it. cat /proc/cpuinfo doesn't list SSE3 capabilities of the CPU, whereas AMD states that newer AMD64 (2005 and after that) are SSE3 capable and gcc-4.3.2 has -march=k8-sse3 it is

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Multilib or not?

2008-11-26 Thread Tonko Mulder
Op donderdag 27-11-2008 om 00:48 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Duncan: Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:34:25 +: As a result of the switch my lvm2 init script started complaining that it is written for baselayout 2 (which I'm