Did you miss my previous post??
What video-driver are you using?
If your using the x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati package, did by any
chance, your update pull in version 6.10 ?
Because if yes, I have exactly the same problem.
Tom
Tom uebersh...@googlemail.com posted
20090219133526.65294...@viciousvincent, excerpted below, on Thu, 19 Feb
2009 13:35:26 +0100:
What video-driver are you using?
If your using the x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati package, did by any chance,
your update pull in version 6.10 ?
Because if yes, I
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Martin Herrman schrieb:
2009/2/19 Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org
mailto:thana...@asyr.hopto.org
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22
EET
2009 x86_64
to...@gaius ~ $ uname -a
Linux Gaius 2.6.28-gentoo-r1 #1 SMP Fri Feb 13 12:05:21 CET 2009
x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor TK-55 AuthenticAMD
GNU/Linux
I am too running xf86-video-ati with no lockups.. (Installed versions: 6.10.0)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Duncan
On Montag 16 Februar 2009, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
After the last round of updates, which was mostly Qt gtk+ my system
has been locking up after a while. On the last occasion I had 'top'
running it showed nothing unusual.
It was mind blowingly difficult to install/rebuild gtk+ as configure
On Donnerstag 19 Februar 2009, Harry Holt wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Martin Herrman schrieb:
2009/2/19 Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org
mailto:thana...@asyr.hopto.org
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Donnerstag 19 Februar 2009, Harry Holt wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Martin Herrman schrieb:
2009/2/19 Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org
2009/2/19 Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22 EET
2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz GenuineIntel
GNU/Linux
Overclocked the core 2 duo (E8400) from 3 to 4GHz using motherboard
BIOS settings. In
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22 EET
2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz GenuineIntel
GNU/Linux
Overclocked the core 2 duo (E8400) from 3 to 4GHz using motherboard
BIOS settings. In mswindblows I can see the
on 02/19/2009 06:23 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22 EET
2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz GenuineIntel
GNU/Linux
Overclocked the core 2 duo (E8400) from 3 to 4GHz using
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
on 02/19/2009 06:23 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22 EET
2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz GenuineIntel
Thanasis schrieb:
on 02/19/2009 06:23 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22 EET
2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz GenuineIntel
GNU/Linux
Overclocked the core 2 duo (E8400) from
on 02/19/2009 06:53 PM Paul Hartman wrote the following:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
on 02/19/2009 06:23 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
on 02/19/2009 06:53 PM Paul Hartman wrote the following:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
on 02/19/2009 06:23 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Thanasis schrieb:
on 02/19/2009 06:23 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22 EET
2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @
on 02/19/2009 07:38 PM Wil Reichert wrote the following:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
on 02/19/2009 06:53 PM Paul Hartman wrote the following:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
on 02/19/2009
on 02/19/2009 07:46 PM Paul Hartman wrote the following:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Thanasis schrieb:
on 02/19/2009 06:23 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
Linux
Thanasis wrote:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22 EET
2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz GenuineIntel
GNU/Linux
Overclocked the core 2 duo (E8400) from 3 to 4GHz using motherboard
BIOS settings. In mswindblows I can see the
on 02/19/2009 06:55 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
on 02/19/2009 06:23 PM Justin wrote the following:
Thanasis schrieb:
# uname -a
Linux wolfdale 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 18 13:53:22 EET
2009 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com posted
200902191546.56204.volkerar...@googlemail.com, excerpted below, on Thu,
19 Feb 2009 15:46:56 +0100:
Get a known good psu and let memtest run for a couple of hours. If it
throws errors, try to increase the voltage of the memory modules a
For processor 0 only? Strange!
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Wil Reichert wil.reich...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I had the exact same behaviour on my Asus Maximus - no speedstep
incorrect cpu info. My current DFI X48 seems to not have these issues
tho
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor
I am almost certain I know what my problem is, however I'll relate the
story as it may help someone else.
Duncan suggested doing a big emerge while in an xterm.
Only HAL Gentoo sources 2.6.27-r8 where available as upgrades which
I did. I then rebuild xorg-server, libx11, glibc.
I was getting
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Tom uebersh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Did you miss my previous post??
Too busy trying things out, sorry.
What video-driver are you using?
If your using the x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati package, did by any
that 1, but version 6.8.0-r1
chance, your update pull
On Freitag 20 Februar 2009, Duncan wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com posted
200902191546.56204.volkerar...@googlemail.com, excerpted below, on Thu,
19 Feb 2009 15:46:56 +0100:
Get a known good psu and let memtest run for a couple of hours. If it
throws errors, try to
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
For processor 0 only? Strange!
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Wil Reichert wil.reich...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I had the exact same behaviour on my Asus Maximus - no speedstep
incorrect cpu info. My current DFI X48
Daiajo Tibdixious dai...@gmail.com posted
a4a9bfcb0902191814m4052f3aci3ac8c6ca07f3b...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:14:55 +1100:
I opened up the case to clean it found the case fan was very dusty,
almost blocked. Everything else didn't look to bad. However I took
Wil Reichert wil.reich...@gmail.com posted
7a329d910902192122q4e80f98p5f1b445dad321...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:22:22 -0800:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com
wrote:
For processor 0 only? Strange!
Not really, the cores scale
27 matches
Mail list logo
