Frank Peters posted
20090425222359.6e3c49ca.frank.pet...@comcast.net, excerpted below, on
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:23:59 -0400:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if this list is the appropriate place to file a bug
> report, but the problem does need confirmation before I go through
> bugzilla.
>
> After b
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:53:23 -0400
Drake Donahue wrote:
>
> more problems than that:
> oddman ~ # cooledit
> cooledit: display :0.0 cannot load font
> -*-fixed-bold-r-*--13-120-*-*-*-80-*
> as a font set - trying raw load.
> cooledit: display :0.0 cannot load font
> -*-fixed-bold-r-*
Hello, and sorry for the late reply.
See my comments
On Wed Apr 15,2009 12:26 pm, Duncan wrote:
> Mansour Al Akeel posted
> 20090413224623.ga20...@mars.lan, excerpted below, on Mon, 13 Apr 2009
> 19:46:24 -0300:
>
> > Dieter:
> > Thank you, that did the trick.
>
> > On Mon Apr 13,2009 06:54
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> skribis:
> I'm sure a lot of folks have a package or two in package.provided.
media-fonts/corefonts is a good candidate for dual boot systems.
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 22:23 -0400, Frank Peters wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if this list is the appropriate place to file a bug
> report, but the problem does need confirmation before I go through
> bugzilla.
>
> After building a working amd64 system using the latest portage tree,
> I emerg
Volker Armin Hemmann posted
200904251903.22817.volkerar...@googlemail.com, excerpted below, on Sat,
25 Apr 2009 19:03:22 +0200:
> On Samstag 25 April 2009, Frank Peters wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:14:21 + (UTC)
>>
>> What I would really like to have, though, is a way to get portage to
>
Hello,
I am not sure if this list is the appropriate place to file a bug
report, but the problem does need confirmation before I go through
bugzilla.
After building a working amd64 system using the latest portage tree,
I emerged my favorite text editor, cooledit, version 3.17.17 To my
surprise,
On Samstag 25 April 2009, Frank Peters wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:14:21 + (UTC)
>
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Second, I'll mention what has become my favorite under-appreciated
> > portage feature, FEATURES=buildpkg. This creates binpkgs (in /usr/
> > portage/package by def
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:14:21 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Second, I'll mention what has become my favorite under-appreciated
> portage feature, FEATURES=buildpkg. This creates binpkgs (in /usr/
> portage/package by default, see the make.conf and portage manpages for
> d
