On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:19:41 +0200
Beso wrote:
> >
> > have you tried revdep-rebuild?! and rebuilding pdnsd?!
>
Well, I think that I have solved the problem -- or at least have
accidentally stumbled upon the solution.
With the new glibc-2.10.0 and pdnsd, DNS lookups from software such
as firef
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:19:41 +0200
Beso wrote:
> >
> > have you tried revdep-rebuild?! and rebuilding pdnsd?!
>
Pdnsd links only against libc and libpthread, both of which are
part of the glibc package.
Pdnsd will compile with the new glibc but the pdnsd log indicates
a lot of query failures.
2009/5/18 Frank Peters
> I just updated my system glibc to version 2.10.1 and this update
> seems to have broken my caching name server pdnsd.
>
> A caching name server stores all recent DNS lookups into a local cache
> so that any subsequent lookups of the same address are much faster.
> The cac
I just updated my system glibc to version 2.10.1 and this update
seems to have broken my caching name server pdnsd.
A caching name server stores all recent DNS lookups into a local cache
so that any subsequent lookups of the same address are much faster.
The caching name server I use is pdnsd beca
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Richard Freeman wrote:
>
> I'll just echo what Duncan said about nice / ionice. However, you might
> find the impact of ionice -c 3 on compilation is reduced if you use a tmpfs
> for /var/tmp/portage. Note that depending on what you're building you might
> need a
Mark Haney wrote:
Is there another way to use nice, or to fix that problem? Or another
way to manage CPU usage during an emerge?
I'll just echo what Duncan said about nice / ionice. However, you might
find the impact of ionice -c 3 on compilation is reduced if you use a
tmpfs for /var/tmp/
Volker Armin Hemmann posted
200905181756.20052.volkerar...@googlemail.com, excerpted below, on Mon,
18 May 2009 17:56:19 +0200:
>> Wil Reichert wrote:
>> >
>> > I've got PORTAGE_NICENESS="15" set in my make.conf. Makes all
>> > emerges unnoticable on my system.
>
> 19 should be better. Once up
Mark Haney wrote:
I've been extremely busy lately and have let my updates get way behind.
Part of that is my need to keep kde-libs-3.5 on my system for K3b, etc,
part of that is just too much else to do.
The problem I've encountered is when I try to do an update while I'm
working, my system can
On Montag 18 Mai 2009, Mark Haney wrote:
> Wil Reichert wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Mark Haney
wrote:
> >> I've been extremely busy lately and have let my updates get way behind.
> >> Part of that is my need to keep kde-libs-3.5 on my system for K3b, etc,
> >> part of that is just
Wil Reichert wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
>> I've been extremely busy lately and have let my updates get way behind.
>> Part of that is my need to keep kde-libs-3.5 on my system for K3b, etc,
>> part of that is just too much else to do.
>>
>> The problem I've encount
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> I've been extremely busy lately and have let my updates get way behind.
> Part of that is my need to keep kde-libs-3.5 on my system for K3b, etc,
> part of that is just too much else to do.
>
> The problem I've encountered is when I try to do an
I've been extremely busy lately and have let my updates get way behind.
Part of that is my need to keep kde-libs-3.5 on my system for K3b, etc,
part of that is just too much else to do.
The problem I've encountered is when I try to do an update while I'm
working, my system can slow to a crawl, on
12 matches
Mail list logo
