You can also solve the Qt blockage with something like:
emerge -av1 `eix -I --only-names x11-libs/qt-`
then continue with whatever you were doing :)
bottom line is, if your emerge command tries to update only a part of
your _installed_ Qt packages, you get blockers.
--
Alex Alexander || wired
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Alex
Alexanderalex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
You can also solve the Qt blockage with something like:
emerge -av1 `eix -I --only-names x11-libs/qt-`
then continue with whatever you were doing :)
bottom line is, if your emerge command tries to update only a
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com posted
5bdc1c8b0906100550w9fc59a0g64f0244abc1ee...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:50:24 -0700:
I think the real problem I'm facing in the future is that emerge -e
@system is building FAR too many things that shouldn't be part of
Duncan wrote:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com posted
5bdc1c8b0906100550w9fc59a0g64f0244abc1ee...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:50:24 -0700:
I think the real problem I'm facing in the future is that emerge -e
@system is building FAR too many things that shouldn't
Duncan wrote:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com posted
5bdc1c8b0906100550w9fc59a0g64f0244abc1ee...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:50:24 -0700:
I think the real problem I'm facing in the future is that emerge -e
@system is building FAR too many things that
John P. Burkett burk...@uri.edu posted 4a2f22f6.8020...@uri.edu,
excerpted below, on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:05:26 -0400:
Thank you, Duncan. I share your preference for open source programs.
[snip]
It seems the two answers from others took care of most of your
questions. FWIW, I don't use
Lie Ryan wrote:
John P. Burkett wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to be the issue here, which brings us to
reason #2. The ati-drivers include a kernel driver, which must be
compiled against a kernel that has been built so the proper parts of it
are exposed for the drivers to use. The
Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org posted
4a2fbda2.4030...@ercbroadband.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Jun 2009
10:05:22 -0400:
Okay, I'm at a loss here, I've been using the ~amd64 version of portage,
which supports sets, however I'm not able to do an 'emerge -pve @system'
as I get:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the real problem I'm facing in the future is that emerge -e
@system is building FAR too many things that shouldn't be part of
@system. Nearly half the packages on this computer (339 out of 815)
are getting pulled
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Duncan1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com posted
5bdc1c8b0906100550w9fc59a0g64f0244abc1ee...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:50:24 -0700:
I think the real problem I'm facing in the future is that emerge -e
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/10/2009 06:05 AM, John P. Burkett wrote:
Thank you, Duncan. I share your preference for open source programs.
I'm not sure how the ati-drivers got on my machine or what they were
doing. If my system functions without them, I'm happy to be rid of them.
You
How to do this with the patch. I have not done this up till know.
Am 07.06.2009 um 20:05 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
There's a patch for this, but it results in the driver spamming
dmesg with about a dozen of kernel data malformed per second. It
also locks up the system here after an hour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John P. Burkett wrote:
Lie Ryan wrote:
John P. Burkett wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to be the issue here, which brings us to
reason #2. The ati-drivers include a kernel driver, which must be
compiled against a kernel that has been built
On Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009, Herbert Laubner wrote:
How to do this with the patch. I have not done this up till know.
go to bugzilla, the ebuild there has the patch. Just download the ebuild, put
it in your overlay, put the patch into the files/ directory, run ebuild ...
manifest, emerge the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Duncan1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com posted
5bdc1c8b0906100550w9fc59a0g64f0244abc1ee...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:50:24 -0700:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
OK, market's closed and machine's back into Gentoo. Figure I might as
well post my complete /etc/make.conf file in case others see problems.
I have a vague recollection that *maybe* I turned on the gnome and/or
kde
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
OK, market's closed and machine's back into Gentoo. Figure I might as
well post my complete /etc/make.conf file in case others see problems.
I
I've been having trouble determining if my processor has hyper-threading. I'm
thinking that it does. I know that it isn't
a dual-core.
If it is a hyper-thread processor, I can't seem to figure out exactly how to
enable the hyper-thread under linux.
First, here's the CPU info from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yo Greg!
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Greg wrote:
I've been having trouble determining if my processor has hyper-threading.
This is from a Xeon:
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Gregjour...@raven.ontheside.net wrote:
I've been having trouble determining if my processor has hyper-threading. I'm
thinking that it does. I know that it isn't
a dual-core.
If it is a hyper-thread processor, I can't seem to figure out exactly how to
enable
On Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009, Greg wrote:
I've been having trouble determining if my processor has hyper-threading.
I'm thinking that it does. I know that it isn't a dual-core.
If it is a hyper-thread processor, I can't seem to figure out exactly how
to enable the hyper-thread under linux.
no
I'm not arguing as I know I don't know when it comes to this topic...
I had read something recently about AMD 6 core processors which were not only 6
core but also performing hyperthreading or
something compatible.
So, am I understanding that no AMDs do the hyperthreading or something
On Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009, Greg wrote:
I'm not arguing as I know I don't know when it comes to this topic...
I had read something recently about AMD 6 core processors which were not
only 6 core but also performing hyperthreading or something compatible.
So, am I understanding that no AMDs
One final thought / question / observation along the same lines...
This is what got me started on this line of thinking / research...
I have experimented with posix threads and find repeatedly that even a
multi-threaded application yields results the same
as if I have coded a
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com posted
5bdc1c8b0906101349u35516e4dj81feca56ef55...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:49:26 -0700:
Figure I might as
well post my complete /etc/make.conf file in case others see problems.
This comment has nothing to do with your case, but
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Duncan1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com posted
5bdc1c8b0906101349u35516e4dj81feca56ef55...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:49:26 -0700:
Figure I might as
well post my complete /etc/make.conf file in case
On 06/11/2009 01:35 AM, Greg wrote:
One final thought / question / observation along the same lines...
This is what got me started on this line of thinking / research...
I have experimented with posix threads and find repeatedly that even a
multi-threaded application yields results the same
Greg wrote:
One final thought / question / observation along the same lines...
This is what got me started on this line of thinking / research...
I have experimented with posix threads and find repeatedly that even a multi-threaded application yields results the same
as if I have coded a
Hung Dang hungp...@gmail.com writes:
Greg wrote:
Is this normal? I thought even under a uniprocessor machine the threads were
to time-slice like on a multicore.
It is depend on your application and how you write your code. For example we
can have a good speed up for dense matrix
29 matches
Mail list logo
