[gentoo-amd64] GTK Negative Widget Height

2015-08-18 Thread Frank Peters
only occasionally and never consistently. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Re: GTK Negative Widget Height

2015-08-18 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:40:32 -0400 Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net wrote: As I mentioned, a program restart usually fixes the problem. However, when and if this problem will occur is not predictable. It happens only occasionally and never consistently. I've discovered something

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Status of Gcc-5.1.0?

2015-05-23 Thread Frank Peters
options may cause problems. Regarding LTO, I experienced a severe problem with ghostscipt due to what I later traced to LTO: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691768 Ever since that time I disabled LTO completely. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Status of Gcc-5.1.0?

2015-05-22 Thread Frank Peters
wait until the isl problem is sorted out. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Status of Gcc-5.1.0?

2015-05-20 Thread Frank Peters
are others able to use gcc-5.1.0? The only way to do so would be to install isl-0.14 in a different slot but I don't think portage will allow this. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package?

2015-03-31 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:02:17 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: As I said, freedomware only, 64-bit-only is almost certainly easiest. If, however, you're running servantware binaries of any sort, well, the signature quote says it, you're effectively a slave to whatever whims

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package?

2015-03-30 Thread Frank Peters
stuff still exists. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Machine recommendations?

2015-03-17 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:29:02 -0400 Randy Barlow ra...@electronsweatshop.com wrote: On 03/17/2015 10:55 PM, Duncan wrote: (As for chrome, even if I could run closed source I'd not trust it. Google is after all an ad/tracking company at core, which after all does own the doubleclick I

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Ffmpeg Emerge Problem

2015-03-10 Thread Frank Peters
previous instructions so only the highest X for a given processor would be appropriate. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Ffmpeg Emerge Problem

2015-03-10 Thread Frank Peters
it wrong. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Ffmpeg Emerge Problem

2015-03-10 Thread Frank Peters
someplace. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Ffmpeg Emerge Problem

2015-03-10 Thread Frank Peters
instruction sets supersede MMX (and mmxext) and so the mmxext flag is really unnecessary on Core i7 and many newer processors. (Ffmpeg may have reasons for still using MMX but I don't know.) Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Systemd migration: opinion and questions

2015-02-24 Thread Frank Peters
Windows so that *they* (RedHat) can be just like MS Windows. Let RedHat leave (fork) the Linux community and go their own separate way. Maybe it's time to begin shifting a lot more attention to Gentoo/FreeBSD. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Nvidia or Xorg Problem with GLX [Solved]

2015-01-21 Thread Frank Peters
of my deliberate flaunting of convention in many areas). Ordinarily I would prefer to avoid such contrivances and rely on manual tweaking, but sometimes I just cannot do it all. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Nvidia or Xorg Problem with GLX [Solved]

2015-01-20 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 13:56:40 -0500 Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net wrote: NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; It seems that the order of the module paths in xorg.conf makes all the difference. By placing the nvidia GLX directory before the xorg GLX directory the problem

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Nvidia or Xorg Problem with GLX [Solved]

2015-01-20 Thread Frank Peters
just move on and not investigate further. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Nvidia or Xorg Problem with GLX

2015-01-19 Thread Frank Peters
-module-can-39-t-init-glx-driver-on-fedoracore-6/ I would doubt that this problem is really new, but it has never affected me before. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Nvidia or Xorg Problem with GLX

2015-01-19 Thread Frank Peters
] nvidia * [2] xorg-x11 Also, re-installing the nvidia-drivers, as the X log file suggests, did not solve the problem. Until I find a proper fix, I'll have to keep the xorg glx module deleted. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Request for verification - Chrome new window moved to other screens is black

2014-12-26 Thread Frank Peters
in pinpointing the source of the problems. You may want to examine the Chrome command-line options in detail to see if anything could help. Does Google provide a debugging build of Chrome? If so then you my want to use it. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Request for verification - Chrome new window moved to other screens is black

2014-12-26 Thread Frank Peters
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:42:19 -0500 Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net wrote: Are there command-line options to Chrome that would provide debugging output? After doing a quick check, I find that these switches may be helpful: Force logging to be enabled. Logging is disabled by default

Re: [gentoo-amd64] ALSA no sound

2014-11-18 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:02:32 +1100 Daiajo Tibdixious dai...@gmail.com wrote: So the problem seems to be java using the wrong card, how to I force it to use the external speakers? The application may have a configuration setting that specifies the audio device to use. This would be found

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: ALSA no sound

2014-11-17 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:59:54 +1100 Daiajo Tibdixious dai...@gmail.com wrote: alsamixer shows 2 cards, 1 HDMI, so I presume I got the right 1. What are your two sound cards? Do you have an NVidia graphics card on your system? If so, then the HDMI may refer to the on-board NVidia sound.

Re: [gentoo-amd64] ALSA no sound

2014-11-17 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:35:29 +1100 Daiajo Tibdixious dai...@gmail.com wrote: alsamixer shows 2 cards, 1 HDMI, so I presume I got the right 1. linux # lsof /dev/snd/pcmC1D3p linux # speaker-test -t wav -c 2 speaker-test 1.0.27.2 Playback device is default The pcmC1D3p device refers to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Boycott Systemd

2014-10-08 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:34:10 -0400 Phil Turmel phi...@turmel.org wrote: You may think its absolutely realistic, but the market doesn't agree with you. Red Hat, SUSE, Canonical, et al call their products *distributions*, not *operating systems* because their customers don't want to create

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Boycott Systemd

2014-10-07 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:45:20 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: And when you look at stuff like Freedesktop the goal is for you to be able to plug a USB headset in and have it suddenly usable for phone calls, just like on any other modern OS. Here is where I, among many others I

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Boycott Systemd

2014-10-07 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 22:28:58 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: You're basically arguing that if somebody putting together an OS has a working solution for something, they should spend just as much effort maintaining 3 other solutions for that something ... No. I am simply stating

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Boycott Systemd

2014-09-24 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:25:34 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Have you tried the kernel's own devtmpfs? How well does it work compared to a static dev, etc? No, I have not tried devtmpfs. The reason for devtmpfs is to allow faster boots by not having udev need to parse the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Boycott Systemd

2014-09-23 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:14:11 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Again, bottom line, report kernel breakage of userspace, the same kernel cycle that breakage happens if at all possible, which means testing an early enough kernel rc (rc3 is good) That certainly is good advice

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Boycott Systemd

2014-09-22 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:00:20 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: As for the loss of the usb static device nodes, did you (Frank) file a bug about it breaking your userspace? That's one of Linus' most firm kernel rules -- you do *NOT* change the userspace/kernelspace API/ABI and

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Boycott Systemd

2014-09-22 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:47:30 -0400 Harry Holt harryh...@gmail.com wrote: Here's another take from Christopher Barry, in a mailing list post from just last month: systemd is a coup. It is a subversive interloper designed to destroy Linux as we know it, foisted upon us by the snarky

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-22 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:11:42 +1000 Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote: Let's make ten different electric sockets, twenty different way to calculate version number for softwares, thirty software licenses, and don't forget to make at least five mutually-incompatible APIs for every browser

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-22 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 03:04:10 +1000 Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote: If you are not contributing to the solutions I use then don't be surprised if my software goes to directions that do not accomodate your own in-house stuffs. There are thousands of people with their own in-house stuffs

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-22 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:58:46 -0500 Barry Schwartz chemoelect...@chemoelectric.org wrote: ‘Diversity’ here is deviation from established Unix/POSIX philosophy in system design. Years of effort to simplify programming are being thrown away on grounds that resemble common arguments in favor of

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-22 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:22:28 -0500 Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: As a professional programmer, I completely disagree with any dogma based on philosophy rather than technical merits. So I think many of the original ideals of UNIX are these days more of a mindset issue than

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-22 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:24:39 -0500 Barry Schwartz chemoelect...@chemoelectric.org wrote: Someone has to write an apocalyptic novel about Linus Torvalds being assassinated and his role taken over by the evil figures from ???. I’m simply concerned that one day he will retire. We are

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-22 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:48:46 -0500 Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: I just said that this thread has *seriously* lacked on technical arguments. I haven't made almost any technical argument, because basically all the discussion has been around conspiracy theories ... *You* call

[gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-21 Thread Frank Peters
For any who need opposing information on systemd, check out the following web page: http://boycottsystemd.org This page was referenced on Slashdot recently and contains a good overview of the undesirability of systemd. Of course, Gentoo is mentioned as one of the few remaining distributions

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-21 Thread Frank Peters
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:22:38 -0500 Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Barry Schwartz chemoelect...@chemoelectric.org wrote: The words ‘Red Hat’ have put a chill down my spine for nearly 20 years. I know, right? A company that actually pays money

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-21 Thread Frank Peters
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:04:32 -0500 Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: You don't *have* to use systemd; but if you *want* something different, then you *should* contribute to the alternatives. Otherwise people (starting with me, for what it matters) will start ignoring you. Oh,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boycott Systemd

2014-09-21 Thread Frank Peters
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:45:17 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: You can create device nodes using mknod, and I'd be shocked if that ever went away. But now certain static USB nodes, in particular those for scanners, have been removed in favor of dynamic allocation using udev or its

Re: [gentoo-amd64] For What It's Worth (or How do I know my Gentoo source code hasn't been messed with?)

2014-08-05 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 15:04:12 -0700 Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: then how do I know that the source code I build on my Gentoo machines hasn't been modified by someone to provide access to my machine, networks, etc.? There are two approaches to system development that tend to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-17 Thread Frank Peters
permissions) but yet it makes perfect sense for my situation. Are single desktop users that much of a minority? I would hope not. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-17 Thread Frank Peters
? Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-17 Thread Frank Peters
be irrevocably disabled for everyone whether they want it or not. An option should never become a law. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-17 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:29:40 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: so make yourself an overlay, put an ebuild with apropriate patches there and be happy. Now that is excellent advice. I've got to get working on this for myself ASAP. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-17 Thread Frank Peters
frame which is costly enough already. With SSP every subroutine call will require an additional reading from /dev/urandom to set up the canary value. This my also deplete the kernel entropy pool. If you want it take it but please allow me to opt out. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-17 Thread Frank Peters
of object oriented languages. Indeed, a good deal of computing power today is used to support the massive layers of abstraction that obliterate a sense of hardware and make life easy for the programmer. But I've said enough already. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-17 Thread Frank Peters
. But, as I already indicated, these things cannot be freely discussed. People will react strongly and begin to adduce all sorts of reasons why such behavior is dangerous. So, for me, it is always a case of don't talk and don't listen. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-17 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:06:35 -0500 Barry Schwartz chemoelect...@chemoelectric.org wrote: Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net skribis: It's amazing how people become nearly apoplectic whenever they encounter a case of a user running entirely as root. It’s no worse than running MSDOS

[gentoo-amd64] Disable SPP On GCC-4.8.3

2014-06-16 Thread Frank Peters
? Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: btrfs Was: Soliciting new RAID ideas

2014-05-29 Thread Frank Peters
Reader, and the Intel ICC compiler are still 32-bit. I wish these folks would get with the modern trends. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] amd64 list, still useful? Was: btrfs

2014-05-29 Thread Frank Peters
to be buggy in places. AMD64 should be the standard but many projects refuse to update since reliance on multi-lib is so much simpler. As a consequence we 64-bit purists are at a disadvantage. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Please get me straight about sysvinit vs. systemd, udev vs eudev vs mdev, virtuals and other things...

2014-03-03 Thread Frank Peters
that: optional. Once it stops being a choice then we begin to deviate greatly from the once sacrosanct principles of free software. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Please get me straight about sysvinit vs. systemd, udev vs eudev vs mdev, virtuals and other things...

2014-03-03 Thread Frank Peters
like Linux From Scratch, which purport to give the user total understanding and control of his system, not including alternatives to udev I begin to have serious doubts. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] LLVM Emerge Conflict

2014-01-18 Thread Frank Peters
[abi_x86_64(-)] required by (media-libs/mesa-9.2.5::gentoo, installed) This message only apears when I do emerge -pvDu world. If I do a direct emerge -pvDu llvm then no conflict message will show. Can anyone shed some light on this? Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] LLVM Emerge Conflict

2014-01-18 Thread Frank Peters
as everything worked. This condition can only be temporary as future releases of mesa will likely use llvm = 3.4. Since on my system llvm is not used for anything else other than mesa gallum, I'll just leave things as they are. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb [Solved]

2013-11-11 Thread Frank Peters
for many years to come. This just underscores the difference between proprietary and open source software. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb

2013-11-09 Thread Frank Peters
knowledge or approval. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb

2013-11-09 Thread Frank Peters
the comments). Why would I want to replace that comfort and ease with the expansive cacophony that is systemd? The freedesktop folks can do as they please, but I will never want to join that party. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb

2013-11-09 Thread Frank Peters
the Linux GE for all time. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb [Solved]

2013-11-09 Thread Frank Peters
these node constraints. I wonder if I can determine the major/minor numbers in some other way. Maybe the /sys tree has that information. If so, then I could completely script the process without using udev. Thanks to all for the contribution. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb [Solved]

2013-11-09 Thread Frank Peters
daemon gets the notice and then reads the new kernel device parameters from somewhere. But from where? If this were known then any script could read the same parameters. In short, if udev reads data from the kernel then a simple custom program or script could accomplish the same thing. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb [Solved]

2013-11-09 Thread Frank Peters
. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] USB Scanner Problems with Newer Kernels/Libusb

2013-11-08 Thread Frank Peters
and sane? Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Wayland and X-Window

2013-10-19 Thread Frank Peters
? Or is the current Gentoo implementation just an incomplete step toward the final wayland? Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Wayland and X-Window

2013-10-19 Thread Frank Peters
. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Wayland and X-Window

2013-10-18 Thread Frank Peters
question then is how much will Wayland be dependent on udev? Will it be an option or mandatory? Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Heads Up Kernel-3.11 Nvidia-drivers

2013-09-03 Thread Frank Peters
A new linux kernel, 3.11, is now released and, as expected, the nvidia-drivers fail to emerge. For the impatient, a patch is available: http://pastebin.com/qV30u23p Just drop the patch file into /etc/portage/patches/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers and you'll be good to go. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Libjpeg-Turbo Drops Newer ABIs

2013-08-02 Thread Frank Peters
know the story behind this elimination of the newer JPEG ABI's and the step back to .so.62? Has any functionality, such as lossless cropping, been affected? Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Libjpeg-Turbo Drops Newer ABIs

2013-08-02 Thread Frank Peters
There is no problem with the latest libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0-r2. I am just wondering why the sudden drop of the ABI's. The legacy libjpeg has gone on to ABI 9 whereas libjpeg-turbo is reverting to the ancient ABI 6. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Libjpeg-Turbo Drops Newer ABIs

2013-08-02 Thread Frank Peters
I just couldn't see it. Maybe because it was listed in Position Statements, which seems more political than technical. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] External USB HD

2013-07-10 Thread Frank Peters
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:02:50 -0400 Ryan Dagey d...@dagey.com wrote: I can only describe my own experience which should not be considered definitive. I use Western Digital USB HDD's, 2 TB capacity, with great success on my Linux system. For this, one needs usb mass storage enabled in the kernel.

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.10 Nvidia Emerge Failure And Other Stuff

2013-07-04 Thread Frank Peters
-attachment/58795/ As long as someone has a patch that's good enough for me. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Kernel-3.10 Nvidia Emerge Failure And Other Stuff

2013-07-04 Thread Frank Peters
the newer Nvidia cards. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Kernel-3.10 Nvidia Emerge Failure And Other Stuff

2013-07-02 Thread Frank Peters
the bash script in its parameter list. At this point is it agetty, or the kernel, that is responsible for executing the autologin script? I need to study this more. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.10 Nvidia Emerge Failure And Other Stuff

2013-07-01 Thread Frank Peters
wait for the eventual rapid fix, because this error is a real show stopper, but I will make an inquiry nonetheless. Has anyone on the list encountered this error with nvidia and kernel-3.10? I hope it is not, again, some strange affliction peculiar to my machine. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.10 Nvidia Emerge Failure And Other Stuff

2013-07-01 Thread Frank Peters
about this problem go back to 3.10-r1 and the nvidia project should have become involved back then. But I suppose my impatience is getting the better of me. I like to put these new releases behind me as quickly as I can. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.10 Nvidia Emerge Failure And Other Stuff

2013-07-01 Thread Frank Peters
the official fix. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-05 Thread Frank Peters
of the source code, but then why is it failing only on my system? I do have USE=-kdrive. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-05 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 03:25:29 -0400 Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net wrote: But, I then installed gcc-4.7.3 in a different slot and tried again to compile. This also failed but the error seems to be a bit different: common/.libs/libcommon.a(xf86Events.o): In function `xf86Wakeup

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-05 Thread Frank Peters
. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Xorg-server-1.14.1.901 Fails Emerge

2013-06-04 Thread Frank Peters
systems. Why is it failing on mine? Has anyone on the list experienced this failure? I would like to remove the -Werror compile flag but without patching the source I don't see how this could be done. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Advice On Enabling Transparent Hugepage

2013-05-03 Thread Frank Peters
://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_transparent_hugepagesnum=1 I think it would probably be best to enable THP in the kernel limited to MADV_HUGEPAGE only. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Advice On Enabling Transparent Hugepage

2013-05-02 Thread Frank Peters
Hugepages or does the allocation occur for all applications? Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Advice On Enabling Transparent Hugepage

2013-05-02 Thread Frank Peters
of that memory at a time (e.g., virtualization systems such as QEMU). I wonder if image or sound processing applications are using MADV_HUGEPAGE. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] eth device vanished

2013-04-15 Thread Frank Peters
to not use that mess known as udev. -- and I hope I will always have that choice. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.8 USB Disconnect

2013-03-11 Thread Frank Peters
mode if I start gpm the disconnects will stop. If I then stop gpm, the disconnects start up again. I'm reporting this behavior to the LKML. It should not be happening. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.8 USB Disconnect

2013-03-08 Thread Frank Peters
) but then why would the USB disconnects suddenly halt under X. USB is built in to the kernel; there are no USB modules loaded. Any comments on how I could investigate this further would be appreciated. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.8 USB Disconnect

2013-03-08 Thread Frank Peters
was producing those USB disconnect messages. If the mouse is not grabbed by something it somehow disconnects. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Keyboard Stops Working Under X [Solved]

2012-11-18 Thread Frank Peters
less about such things, but, for me, the issue of choice is much more than just a philosophical rant. It has significant practical consequences as well, but a discussion of those would be too far off topic. Thanks to all those who offered advice. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Keyboard Stops Working Under X

2012-11-17 Thread Frank Peters
(or any equivalent). If others desire to have it, then that is their choice, but I should never be forced to follow along. Hopefully, Gentoo has not lost this understanding and will strive to maintain the wisdom. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Keyboard Stops Working Under X

2012-11-15 Thread Frank Peters
, but, since things have been working effectively -- and this is a late model Core i7 based system -- I felt no pressing need. But your argument has convinced me to bring this task up a few notches in priority. Frank Peters

[gentoo-amd64] Keyboard Stops Working Under X

2012-11-14 Thread Frank Peters
. The problem seems to coincide with one of the several nvidia updates, but this is still a guess. My system is updated daily and I use only the Fvwm window manager (no Gnome or K). How can I debug this further? Both the kernel log and the X log show nothing whatever. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Keyboard Stops Working Under X

2012-11-14 Thread Frank Peters
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:31:50 -0200 Luis Gustavo Vilela de Oliveira luisgustavo.vil...@gmail.com wrote: What input drivers you're using? xf86-input-mouse-1.8.1 xf86-input-keyboard-1.6.2 Also, I am not using the auto configuration but I have a custom X config file. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Keyboard Stops Working Under X

2012-11-14 Thread Frank Peters
downgrades and comparisons. For the moment, at least, my solution will be to stop and then restart X. But if things do not clear up, I eventually will have to search for a way to debug or get some sort of diagnostic output. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Keyboard Stops Working Under X

2012-11-14 Thread Frank Peters
no motivation to change. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I can research what needs to be done to change over to using evdev. But if the legacy keyboard and mouse drivers have been made obsolete by evdev, then why are they still being distributed? Is it only to accommodate older systems? Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Keyboard Stops Working Under X

2012-11-14 Thread Frank Peters
(brand new) that I can attach. If the problem persists then I'll have to switch over to evdev -- but that won't be for a few weeks yet. Thanks for all the responses. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Drivers For USB HDD

2012-05-10 Thread Frank Peters
is basically write once, read many. Also, the drive has been formatted into several smaller partitions. For this kind of use I don't need the capabilities of ext4. In fact I don't even need a journal and could probably use ext2 just as well. Frank Peters

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Drivers For USB HDD

2012-05-09 Thread Frank Peters
On Mon, 7 May 2012 09:34:58 -0400 Frank Peters frank.pet...@comcast.net wrote: The Seagate drive has already been returned to the seller. I am expecting a Western Digital Elements 2TB USB HDD to arrive in a few days. If this new drive also fails then I will post more information. I just

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Drivers For USB HDD

2012-05-07 Thread Frank Peters
are the sg and usb-storage modules. The Seagate drive has already been returned to the seller. I am expecting a Western Digital Elements 2TB USB HDD to arrive in a few days. If this new drive also fails then I will post more information. Frank Peters

  1   2   3   >