On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:13:28PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Darragh Bailey posted
> 20090211104856.gb22...@compsoc.nuigalway.ie, excerpted below, on Wed, 11
> Feb 2009 10:48:56 +:
>
>
> > I've run into the annoyance of not being able to run certain 32bit apps
> > on multilib gentoo since they
Darragh Bailey posted
20090211104856.gb22...@compsoc.nuigalway.ie, excerpted below, on Wed, 11
Feb 2009 10:48:56 +:
> I've run into the annoyance of not being able to run certain 32bit apps
> on multilib gentoo since they require libraries that are not part of the
> emul-* packages. I also
Daniel Gryniewicz posted
1234208471.16043.9.ca...@athena.ghs.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Feb
2009 14:41:11 -0500:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~kanaka/auto-multilib/
>
> Alternatively, I have a mostly working 32bit userland version that I
> talk about here:
> http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/20
Daniel Gryniewicz posted
1234208471.16043.9.ca...@athena.ghs.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Feb
2009 14:41:11 -0500:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~kanaka/auto-multilib/
That makes sense. It is one solution I had envisioned myself. Of course
I'm 64-bit only on my main system and would not wish t
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:41:11PM -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> > A bit off topic, but sometimes I wish Gentoo had some mechanism of
> > allowing for 32-bit builds of libraries instead of needing -emul
> > packages. But I guess that would be too much work with no real gain
> > since only f
Mark Knecht posted
5bdc1c8b0902091345j2c28d406ve5cbd45a98670...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:45:42 -0800:
> I guess the question I'd have, looking at the above, would be, for
> instance, *exactly* what does emul-linux-x86-baselibs emulate from a
> 32-bit system? basela
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> El Lun, 9 de Febrero de 2009, 21:33, Nikos Chantziaras escribió:
>> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>>
>>> El Lun, 9 de Febrero de 2009, 20:18, Mark Knecht escribió:
>>>
Whether there's a real gain would seem to me to depend on how well
the e
Mark Knecht posted
5bdc1c8b0902091114l35f2f293o48752af4bcc64...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0800:
> Duncan,
>As always I'm in awe of your knowledge. Thanks for the info.
Well... I had heard that ldd was a shell script, and had marked that
down as a bit o
El Lun, 9 de Febrero de 2009, 21:33, Nikos Chantziaras escribió:
> Jesús Guerrero wrote:
>
>> El Lun, 9 de Febrero de 2009, 20:18, Mark Knecht escribió:
>>
>>> Whether there's a real gain would seem to me to depend on how well
>>> the emulation libraries do their job I suppose. What's different abo
Jesús Guerrero wrote:
El Lun, 9 de Febrero de 2009, 20:18, Mark Knecht escribió:
Whether there's a real gain would seem to me to depend on how well the
emulation libraries do their job I suppose. What's different about what's
in the emulation libraries vs getting the real 32-bit library?
None.
Nikos Chantziaras posted gmp8bf$80...@ger.gmane.org,
excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:42:24 +0200:
> A bit off topic, but sometimes I wish Gentoo had some mechanism of
> allowing for 32-bit builds of libraries instead of needing -emul
> packages. But I guess that would be too much work w
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 14:42 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> > The binary should be a 32-bit or 64-bit dynamically linked ELF
> > executable, tho in this case "executable" includes shared object
> > libraries as well, so you can see what other libraries libraries depend
> > on,
El Lun, 9 de Febrero de 2009, 20:18, Mark Knecht escribió:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
> wrote:
>
>> Duncan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The binary should be a 32-bit or 64-bit dynamically linked ELF
>>> executable, tho in this case "executable" includes shared object
>>> libraries as
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
>>
>> The binary should be a 32-bit or 64-bit dynamically linked ELF executable,
>> tho in this case "executable" includes shared object libraries as well, so
>> you can see what other libraries libraries depend on, too.
>
>
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Mark Knecht posted
> 5bdc1c8b0902081710v321d81fcy7fc90152...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
> below, on Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:10:19 -0800:
>
>> t may be working ONLY becuase chuck itself is completely self contained
>> in a sing
Duncan wrote:
The binary should be a 32-bit or 64-bit dynamically linked ELF
executable, tho in this case "executable" includes shared object
libraries as well, so you can see what other libraries libraries depend
on, too.
A bit off topic, but sometimes I wish Gentoo had some mechanism of
al
Mark Knecht posted
5bdc1c8b0902081710v321d81fcy7fc90152...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:10:19 -0800:
> t may be working ONLY becuase chuck itself is completely self contained
> in a single file. I presume that it must be calling the emulation
> libraries. Do you kn
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm wondering what happens if I build it on a 32-bit Gentoo box and
then just move it over? (Or in a 32-bit VM in
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm wondering what happens if I build it on a 32-bit Gentoo box and
then just move it over? (Or in a 32-bit VM in a vmware session.)
"equery files chuck" seems to say there is nothing other than the
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to run the Chuck programming language on my 64-bit
machine but it's segfaulting. An indiv
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>>
>>> Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to run the Chuck programming language on my 64-bit
machine but it's segfaulting. An indiv
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to run the Chuck programming language on my 64-bit
machine but it's segfaulting. An individual more experienced with
Chuck suggested that maybe it needs to be built as a 32-bit a
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm trying to run the Chuck programming language on my 64-bit
>> machine but it's segfaulting. An individual more experienced with
>> Chuck suggested that maybe it needs to be built as a 32-bit app. I'
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to run the Chuck programming language on my 64-bit
machine but it's segfaulting. An individual more experienced with
Chuck suggested that maybe it needs to be built as a 32-bit app. I'm
looking for instructions on how to do that.
Try putting "-m32" in CF
24 matches
Mail list logo
