Try with Trond Myklebust's latest NFS patchset from
http://client.linux-nfs.org/
If that doesn't help, check your actual disk performance, if the disks
in the server aren't fast, no NFS optimizations are going to help you.
Failing everything else, ask on the lkml about it, they usually pretty
Steve Herber wrote:
Could you document you setup and test procedure?
I use NFS for most disk storage but have never tried to tune it much.
Any performance suggestions are welcome.
Thanks,
Steve Herber[EMAIL PROTECTED]work: 206-221-7262
Security Engineer, UW Medicine, IT Services
P.V.Anthony wrote:
Test on the ethernet connection.
# nttcp -T 10.0.0.100
Bytes Real s CPU s Real-MBit/s CPU-MBit/s Calls Real-C/s
CPU-C/s
l 83886080.090.02788.3382 2918.28422048 24058.17
89059.0
1 83886080.090.08776.0673838.80842195
P.V.Anthony wrote:
Hi,
I am on the nfs stuff again. Still trying to get a better speed.
Currently I am only getting 40Mb/sec. I am hoping for 80Mb/sec. I am
using Gigabit ethernet.
Anyway while I was googling, I came across some sites that were saying
that freebsd is better for nfs.
Could you document you setup and test procedure?
I use NFS for most disk storage but have never tried to tune it much.
Any performance suggestions are welcome.
Thanks,
Steve Herber[EMAIL PROTECTED] work: 206-221-7262
Security Engineer, UW Medicine, IT Services home:
Hi,
P.V.Anthony wrote:
Currently I am only getting 40Mb/sec. I am hoping for 80Mb/sec. I am
using Gigabit ethernet.
I have no idea about FreeBSD and its performance, but looking at your numbers, I
think it is rather your hd (on any of the boxes you connect) than NFS. What hds
do you use,
Hi,
I am on the nfs stuff again. Still trying to get a better speed. Currently I am
only getting 40Mb/sec. I am hoping for 80Mb/sec. I am using Gigabit ethernet.
Anyway while I was googling, I came across some sites that were saying that
freebsd is better for nfs.
Has anyone experienced
