[gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Duncan
Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org posted 4a4b4a11.8040...@ercbroadband.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:35:45 -0400: Fernando Boaglio wrote: It's already there! []'s Fernando Boaglio Okay, I've sync'd portage twice the last two days and don't see it. Is it hard masked

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:11:05 + (UTC) schrieb Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net: Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org posted 4a4b4a11.8040...@ercbroadband.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:35:45 -0400: Fernando Boaglio wrote: It's already there! []'s Fernando Boaglio

[gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Duncan
Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de posted 20090701150926.5b14a...@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de, excerpted below, on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:09:26 +0200: Well, I just installed FF 3.5 last night, so I wonder why it is that you're having problems seeing it. Not to mention according to [0] and [1], FF

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Mark Haney
Duncan wrote: Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de posted 20090701150926.5b14a...@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de, excerpted below, on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:09:26 +0200: Well, I just installed FF 3.5 last night, so I wonder why it is that you're having problems seeing it. Must be... Well I've

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Bob Sanders
Mark Haney, mused, then expounded: Well I've resync'd portage once this morning and once this afternoon. No FF. That's really rather annoying. It's there - $ cat /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox-3.5.ebuild |grep KEY KEYWORDS=~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Mark Haney
Bob Sanders wrote: Mark Haney, mused, then expounded: Sorry, it's masked - !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 (masked by:

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mark Haneymha...@ercbroadband.org wrote: Okay, based on what I read, the ebuild was masked ~amd64, right? If so, the Accepting the ~amd64 keyword should allow me to install it, right? If that's the case, then my portage doesn't have it. You need to unmask it in

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Bob Sanders
Mark Haney, mused, then expounded: Bob Sanders wrote: Mark Haney, mused, then expounded: Sorry, it's masked - !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: -

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Sebastian Beßler
Mark Haney schrieb: Bob Sanders wrote: Mark Haney, mused, then expounded: Sorry, it's masked - !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: -

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Mark Haney
Bob Sanders wrote: No, it's not just arch masked. It's masked in package.mask. So simply using a keyword unmask won't work. And you're portage does have it. Give this a try - ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 emerge -av =mozilla-firefox-3.5 But it's not going to let you install it

[gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

2009-07-01 Thread Duncan
Mark Haney mha...@ercbroadband.org posted 4a4bb3d9.8070...@ercbroadband.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:07:05 -0400: I stand corrected. My apologies. My brain just isn't working, I'm due for surgery to remove a large bone fragment from my foot, so all the vicodin I'm taking must