Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-22 Thread Joel Wiramu Pauling
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 15:24 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 14:28 -0400, Nuitari wrote: It works perfectly on amd64 I don't know what system setup you had but I have no issues. x11vnc also works great for attaching for existing X sessions. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailin

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-22 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 14:28 -0400, Nuitari wrote: > >> Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > >>> Except that it doesn't work on amd64. I set out to make it work at one > >>> point, and made thousands of changes just to make it 64-bit clean, and > >>> it still didn't work. > >> > >> At least as client it work

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-22 Thread Dmitri Pogosyan
> >> Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > >>> Except that it doesn't work on amd64. I set out to make it work at one > >>> point, and made thousands of changes just to make it 64-bit clean, and > >>> it still didn't work. > >> > >> At least as client it works great here, can't say about the server part, >

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-22 Thread Nuitari
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: Except that it doesn't work on amd64. I set out to make it work at one point, and made thousands of changes just to make it 64-bit clean, and it still didn't work. At least as client it works great here, can't say about the server part, as I use vino for that. Okay,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-22 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 19:32 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: > Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > Except that it doesn't work on amd64. I set out to make it work at one > > point, and made thousands of changes just to make it 64-bit clean, and > > it still didn't work. > > At least as client it works great

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-22 Thread Simon Stelling
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: Except that it doesn't work on amd64. I set out to make it work at one point, and made thousands of changes just to make it 64-bit clean, and it still didn't work. At least as client it works great here, can't say about the server part, as I use vino for that. -- Si

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-22 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 16:56 +1300, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 00:00 -0600, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: > > [ebuild R ] net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 +server 0 kB > > > You should use tightvnc (you can't have both to emerge -C vnc first) > it's server and client are much more advanced

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-21 Thread Dmitri Pogosyan
> On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 00:00 -0600, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: > > [ebuild R ] net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 +server 0 kB > > > You should use tightvnc (you can't have both to emerge -C vnc first) > it's server and client are much more advanced and support more features > than the realvnc reference implem

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-21 Thread Joel Wiramu Pauling
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 00:00 -0600, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: > [ebuild R ] net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 +server 0 kB > You should use tightvnc (you can't have both to emerge -C vnc first) it's server and client are much more advanced and support more features than the realvnc reference implementation. -

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-20 Thread Dmitri Pogosyan
[ebuild R ] net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 +server 0 kB works just fine for me (gentoo-amd64) > Hi All > > What are you using for VNC or remote terminal access? Neither RealVNC > nor tightVNC compile for me on gentoo-amd64. > > Any ideas? > > James > -- > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-20 Thread Nuitari
> What are you using for VNC or remote terminal access? Neither RealVNC > nor tightVNC compile for me on gentoo-amd64. I have net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 (aka realvnc), with the server enabled. I'm using ~amd64 That's interesting - how did you enable the server? I just never got a vncserver bina

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-20 Thread James Pattinson
Nuitari wrote: What are you using for VNC or remote terminal access? Neither RealVNC nor tightVNC compile for me on gentoo-amd64. I have net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 (aka realvnc), with the server enabled. I'm using ~amd64 That's interesting - how did you enable the server? I just never got a vncs

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-20 Thread Richard Freeman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, October 20, 2005 7:48 pm, James Pattinson wrote: > Hi All > > What are you using for VNC or remote terminal access? Neither RealVNC > nor tightVNC compile for me on gentoo-amd64. > I used the messy procedure of building a freenx server on x86,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-20 Thread Nuitari
What are you using for VNC or remote terminal access? Neither RealVNC nor tightVNC compile for me on gentoo-amd64. I have net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 (aka realvnc), with the server enabled. I'm using ~amd64 -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-amd64] VNC

2005-10-20 Thread James Pattinson
Hi All What are you using for VNC or remote terminal access? Neither RealVNC nor tightVNC compile for me on gentoo-amd64. Any ideas? James -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list